On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 20:35 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > Bart, > > > You are right of course. The reason I would like to inline that > > function is because it was essential in the past to have that code as > > a separate function but after patch 1/2 inlining that function makes > > sd_probe() easier to read. Martin, do you want me to resubmit this > > patch series with an updated commit message or do you rather prefer to > > update the commit message yourself? > > Just mail me a reworded blurb.
Hi Martin, How about the following: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Make sd_probe() easier to read by inlining sd_probe_part2(). This patch does not change any functionality. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, Bart.
