On 3/21/19 2:39 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 20:35 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>> Bart,
>>
>>> You are right of course. The reason I would like to inline that
>>> function is because it was essential in the past to have that code as
>>> a separate function but after patch 1/2 inlining that function makes
>>> sd_probe() easier to read. Martin, do you want me to resubmit this
>>> patch series with an updated commit message or do you rather prefer to
>>> update the commit message yourself?
>>
>> Just mail me a reworded blurb.
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> How about the following:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Make sd_probe() easier to read by inlining sd_probe_part2(). This patch
> does not change any functionality.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
>
Given the updated blurb:
Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan <[email protected]>
