>
> But this thread started out with comparisons to Solaris, and frankly, Solaris
> (out of the box) isn't in any better shape than Linux is (which I pointed out)
> with respect to FC midlayer stuff, or storage management (with the default end
> user product). It's only when you add some adult commercial products (like
> Veritas stuff) that this stuff becomes managable.
Matt,
The comparison to Solaris came about because I referenced a SunServer
article talking about the maturity of Linux and SANs. In fact, the author
never talked about Solaris, hope I was misleading.
In fact he was positive about LInux in general. I wish I could have posted the
article, but as before I couldn't find a URL on their website.
--
Mark Veteikis [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1-214-654-5257
Interphase Corp. 13800 Senlac Dallas Tx. 75234
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
