> I don't think there are other issues with increasing the limit. For > that matter, I am not entirely sure why there is this arbitrary limit in the > code here. In other words, I am not sure if I even added it - it may have > gotten added by someone else as part of the ll_rw_blk cleanups. The sglist itself presumably has a size limit and we would need to keep the sg list allocation under a page. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Request splits Brian Pomerantz
- Re: Request splits Alan Cox
- Re: Request splits Brian Pomerantz
- Re: Request splits Brian Pomerantz
- Re: Request splits Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: Request splits Chaitanya Tumuluri
- Re: Request splits G�rard Roudier
- Re: Request splits Brian Pomerantz
- Re: Request splits Douglas Gilbert
- Re: Request splits Eric Youngdale
- Re: Request splits Alan Cox
- Re: Request splits Eric Youngdale
- PATCH: Enhance queueing/scsi-midl... Chaitanya Tumuluri
- Re: PATCH: Enhance queueing/s... Eric Youngdale
- Re: PATCH: Enhance queuei... Alan Cox
- Re: PATCH: Enhance queuei... Chaitanya Tumuluri
- Re: PATCH: Enhance queuei... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: PATCH: Enhance queuei... Chaitanya Tumuluri
- Re: PATCH: Enhance queueing/s... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: PATCH: Enhance queuei... Brian Pomerantz
- Re: PATCH: Enhance queuei... Stephen C. Tweedie
