Hi,
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 08:48:42AM -0700, Brian Pomerantz wrote:
> > The real solution is probably not to increase the atomic I/O size, but
> > rather to pipeline I/Os. That is planned for the future, and now there
>
> That really depends on the device characteristics. This Ciprico
> hardware I've been working with really only performs well if the
> atomic I/O size is >= 1MB. Once you introduce additional transactions
> across the bus, your performance drops significantly. I guess it is a
> tradeoff between latency and bandwidth. Unless you mean the low level
> device would be handed a vector of kiobufs and it would build a single
> SCSI request with that vector,
ll_rw_block can already do that, but...
> then I suppose it would work well but
> the requests would have to make up a contiguous chunk of drive space.
... a single request _must_, by definition, be contiguous. There is
simply no way for the kernel to deal with non-contiguous atomic I/Os.
I'm not sure what you're talking about here --- how can an atomic I/O
be anything else? We can do scatter-gather, but only from scattered
memory, not to scattered disk blocks.
--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
