Hi,

I'm not sure this information is useful or not, but I just made
Sysmtecalls <-> security functions/capabilities mapping
sheets for understanding LSM's framework(and enhancement LIDS:-) ).

You can download some Excel sheets from;
http://www.selinux.gr.jp/LIDS-JP/systemcalls.html
(These Excel sheets are made by OpenOffice, so it might have
some font problem.)

I checked 2.6.20-kernel source code by using lxr and grep,
so I guess I have some mistakes in these files.
But I believe this sheet is helpful for checking current
LSM framework are "sufficient" or "insufficient".

Sincerely,

OMO

Hao Xu wrote: (2007/04/08 14:08):

> Hi!
> 
> If the purpose of the LSM framework is not just satisfying selinux, then
> the reason for adding this hook is obvious: we NEED a way to update the
> incore inode security data after successful removexattr operations, it's
> undoubtedly necessary for a xattr based security module. I don't
> consider the framework as complete without this hook.
> 
> I didn't give the patch here because it's trivial. I'd like to hear some
> comments first.
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> hao
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> linux-security-module" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


-- 
Kazuki Omo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Group Manager, OSS Solution Center
Diary: http://omok.livejournal.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to