Linux-Setup Digest #437, Volume #19              Sun, 20 Aug 00 18:13:08 EDT

Contents:
  remove the start up programs (Rewur)
  Re: CD writer setup question (Carlos Moreno)
  Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script. (blowfish)
  Re: xcdroast doesnt recognize Sony CDRW ("Gareth Cranny")
  Re: On booting I just get LI404040404040 ... ("John Smith")
  Re: Which verison of X Free 86 is in Mandrake 7.1? ("Vikas R")
  Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script. ("NuQ")
  Re: Needing help with Samba (Tim Johnston)
  Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script. ("Andrew N. McGuire ")
  Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script. ("Andrew N. McGuire ")
  Re: CD writer setup question (Kyle Parfrey)
  Re: Needing help with Samba (Tim Johnston)
  Re: resolution - modeline-settings ("Thomas Dedeyne")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Rewur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux
Subject: remove the start up programs
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 15:14:50 -0400

Hi
How to remove the start up programs ( like File Manger. ) that starts up
automatically after Linux is loaded.
Please Help

-Rewur


------------------------------

From: Carlos Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CD writer setup question
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 15:18:37 -0400

Kyle Parfrey wrote:
> 
> I just read an above posting, so I should say also:
> In the kernel module list there is nothing about generic scsi, there is
> ide-scsi, and scsi-mod and sg...
> How do you set these parameters before booting? And will I need to do a
> kernel recompile? :(

As far as I remember, yes, you would need to recompile your kernel,
unless 
you have a SCSI CD-Writer. 

But maybe you shouln't trust me too much;  I really had trouble setting 
up XCDroast, and I ended up giving up  :-(  (yes, I have to reboot to 
Windows every time I need to write a CD...) 

Basically, I was never able to record audio CD's;  every time that I 
would record a data CD, the temp partition that xcdroast used became 
useless (the system wouldn't see it anymore -- not Linux, not Win NT). 
And on top of that, I kept having trouble when reading from Windows 
any data CD's created with xcdroast  :-( 

I hope xcdroast improves in the near future, or that some replacements 
that do work appear...  (well, maybe xcdroast does work fine, but if 
you have to be a Linux guru to make it work, then I don't consider 
that "working fine"...)

Carlos
--

------------------------------

From: blowfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,omp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 12:32:19 -0700

"Andrew N. McGuire" wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, blowfish (Alex Lam) quoth:
> 
> ~~ Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 20:54:05 -0700
> ~~ From: "blowfish (Alex Lam)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ~~ Reply-To: ..
> ~~ Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d, comp.os.linux.setup,
> ~~     omp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.security, comp.os.linux.misc
> ~~ Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
> ~~
> 
> [ snip post, again ]
> 
> Sorry for the second reply, but I have looked through the Perl
> script that is a supposed 'Trojan'.  It is not a Trojan Horse, it
> looked like familiar bad code, and it was.  It is a 3 line RSA
> encryption program written in Perl.  It is also broken and pretty
> much about the worst code I have ever seen (that is taking into
> account the fact that it is obfuscated as well).  In other words,
> there is no reason to fear that Perl snippet, and you have just
> wasted a tremendous amount of bandwidth.
> 
> anm
> --
>
It's bad code all right. But it did try to install a "new" KDE on my
machine.

Yes, it even pops up a new window asking me if I wanted to proceed?

- blowfish.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~ Andrew N. McGuire                                                      ~
> ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                              ~
> ~ "Plan to throw one away; you will, anyhow." - Frederick P. Brooks, Jr. ~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

------------------------------

From: "Gareth Cranny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: xcdroast doesnt recognize Sony CDRW
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 16:13:46 -0400

Here's another question actually.....How do I do this in CLOS???  What file
should I insert the alias into, and CLOS has the graphic LILO, unless you
mean to put that line in lilo.conf

Gareth.
Yeah, I'm still new, what can I do but ask questions?

Gareth Cranny wrote in message
<0Xhn5.1429$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>For an IDE drive I should enable SCSI support?   Damn :)   No wonder this
is
>taking me so freaking long :)   Thanks for the tip!
>
>Gareth.
>
>Christian Burstein wrote in message ...
>>On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:49:14 -0400, Gareth Cranny
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>wrote:
>>>CLOS, and x-cdroast will let me use the drive as a reader, but not a
>>>writer....any ideas?
>>
>> Is it a IDE writer? Then you should enable
>>
>> SCSI-Support [*]
>> Generic SCSI [*]
>> SCSI Cdrom   [*]
>> SCSI Emulation Support [*]
>>
>> enabled in Kernelconfig. Compile Kernel, reboot with new Kernel
>> at LILO: enter <Your Linux> hd?=ide-scsi,max_scsi_luns=1
>> where hd?  is your writer
>>
>> Oh, and dont forget to insert alias scsi_hostadapter=ide-scsi
>> BEFORE booting
>>
>> Or simply read the CD-Writer-HOWTO (?)
>>>
>>>TIA,
>>>Gareth
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Tsch� denn,
>> Christian...
>>--
>>                                /"\  ASCII Ribbon Campaign
>> ICQ : 13367211                 \ /
>> PGP-Key-ID: 0x8990FCEB          X         No HTML in
>>                                / \       email & news
>
>



------------------------------

From: "John Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: On booting I just get LI404040404040 ...
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 16:03:36 -0400

Dear John:
Can you tell me how can I make a boot disk without using 'mkbootdisk'?

#mkbootdisk --device /dev/fd0 2.2.16-3
I get
"Fatal: pen /boot/boot.b: No such file or directory"

but that file do exist.
Yours
Gu
===== Original Message =====
From: John Coffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Yong S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2000 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: On booting I just get LI404040404040 ...


> LILO version 21 does not support the "-L" switch; only the "-l" switch.
>
> If your BIOS support EDD packet calls on int 0x13, then versions of LILO
> beyond
> 21.3 will help you.  21.5 is current.
>
>    ftp:  brun.dyndns.org
>    dir:  /pub/linux/lilo
>
> There is an option to "make floppy", which will produce a diagnostic
> diskette.  I suggest that you boot this diskette, to see what it reports
> about your BIOS.  If it reports an EDD compliant BIOS, then you can use
the
> new version of LILO:  with "-L" or "lba32".  Do a "make install; lilo -L".
>
> --John
>
>
>

John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8nns9r$ckt$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello all:
> Redhat 6.2 on PIII 550. with 13G hardrive.
> Dual boot with windows98. I have tried the newest lilo 21.5 and tried
the -L
> option
> or 'linear' mode. But it still can't boot correctly.
> My guess is the H/S/C is too wired 16/63/26354 is far beyond the 1024
limit.
>
>
> Do you have any way to solve it?
>
>



------------------------------

From: "Vikas R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Which verison of X Free 86 is in Mandrake 7.1?
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 20:11:26 GMT

Thats correct. However, I could not get 4.0 up and running and had to switch
to 3.3.x
sfcybear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8nnokd$gp9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Xfree 4.0 comes with Mandrake 7.1. you have a choice of which to load.
> the 3.x or 4.0.
>
>
> In article <399f5880$0$66410$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   "Gerardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Which version of X Free 86 is in Mandrake 7.1?  Is Xfree 86 4.0
> available in
> > any distribution?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gerardo
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.



------------------------------

From: "NuQ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 15:23:24 -0500

x-no-archive: yes
"blowfish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> "Andrew N. McGuire" wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, blowfish (Alex Lam) quoth:
> >
> > ~~ Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 20:54:05 -0700
> > ~~ From: "blowfish (Alex Lam)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ~~ Reply-To: ..
> > ~~ Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d, comp.os.linux.setup,
> > ~~     omp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.security,
comp.os.linux.misc
> > ~~ Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
> > ~~
> >
> > [ snip post, again ]
> >
> > Sorry for the second reply, but I have looked through the Perl
> > script that is a supposed 'Trojan'.  It is not a Trojan Horse, it
> > looked like familiar bad code, and it was.  It is a 3 line RSA
> > encryption program written in Perl.  It is also broken and pretty
> > much about the worst code I have ever seen (that is taking into
> > account the fact that it is obfuscated as well).  In other words,
> > there is no reason to fear that Perl snippet, and you have just
> > wasted a tremendous amount of bandwidth.
> >
> > anm
> > --
> >
> It's bad code all right. But it did try to install a "new" KDE on my
> machine.
>
> Yes, it even pops up a new window asking me if I wanted to proceed?
>

So it only affects Linux users?  Heheh ;-)

NuQ




------------------------------

From: Tim Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Needing help with Samba
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:59:58 -0700

Didn't work.  This is very frustrating!
I'm going to try to rebuild my rpm DB.

Dr. Tu Yu wrote:

> Sounds like samba is not installed.   As a SU try installing Samba
>  rpm -UvhF samba*.rpm
>
> Then you should be able to start samba using    /usr/sbin/samba start |
> restart | stop
>
> "Tim Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I've installed the Workstation version of Red Hat 6.2 with the KDE and
> > I'm needing to get samba up and running.  I've read all the samba
> > documentation I can get my hands on but I'm stuck.  Red Hat's
> > documentation says that samba is installed by default.  Is this not
> > true?  Here's what I've tried so far:
> >
> > 1) At boot time samba is not started.  I thought by default it would be
> > running? I do not see any running processes relating to samba, i.e. smbd
> > or nmbd.
> >
> > 2) I've tried both of these and they do not work:
> >          /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start
> >    and
> >         smbd -D and nmbd -D
> >
> > 3) I looked for the log directory /var/log/samba/  but is does not
> > exist.
> >
> > 4) I see that I have a smb.conf file! Why would I have a smb.conf file
> > if samba was not installed?  I haven't made any changes yet, I want to
> > get the daemons running first and then I'll config them.
> >
> > 5) I went into linuxconf (Control:Control panel:Control Service
> > Activity) and I did not see smb as an availble service in the list for
> > activation or deactivation.
> >
> > 6) I used Red Hat's KPackage (RPM:Applications:System) and I see both
> > samba-client and samba-common.  Doesn't that mean samba is installed?
> >
> > 7) I ran rpm -q samba  and it says samba is not installed.
> >
> > 8) I ran testparm /etc/smb.conf and I get:
> >
> >          Load smb config files from etc/smb.conf
> >          Processing Section "[homes]"
> >          Processing Section "[printers]"
> >          Load Services file OK.
> >          ERROR: lock directory /var/lock/samba does not exist.
> >
> >      Why would RH config my file to point to a dir that does not exist?
> >
> >
> > So is samba installed or not?  I can't figure it out!
> >
> > If I need to install samba could someone give me some dummy instuctions
> > on how do do it?  I've read the HOW-TO's and make and compile and rpm's
> > but I admit it's a bit confusing to me.  What's the difference between
> > make and compile anyways?
> >
> > Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!!
> >
> > Tim Johnston
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >


------------------------------

Crossposted-To: 
alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.misc
From: "Andrew N. McGuire " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 15:58:10 -0500

On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, NuQ quoth:

~~ Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 15:23:24 -0500
~~ From: NuQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~~ Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d, comp.os.linux.setup,
~~     comp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.security, comp.os.linux.misc
~~ Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
~~ 
~~ x-no-archive: yes
~~ "blowfish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
~~ news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
~~ > "Andrew N. McGuire" wrote:
~~ > >
~~ > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, blowfish (Alex Lam) quoth:
~~ > >
~~ > > ~~ Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 20:54:05 -0700
~~ > > ~~ From: "blowfish (Alex Lam)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~~ > > ~~ Reply-To: ..
~~ > > ~~ Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d, comp.os.linux.setup,
~~ > > ~~     omp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.security,
~~ comp.os.linux.misc
~~ > > ~~ Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
~~ > > ~~
~~ > >
~~ > > [ snip post, again ]
~~ > >
~~ > > Sorry for the second reply, but I have looked through the Perl
~~ > > script that is a supposed 'Trojan'.  It is not a Trojan Horse, it
~~ > > looked like familiar bad code, and it was.  It is a 3 line RSA
~~ > > encryption program written in Perl.  It is also broken and pretty
~~ > > much about the worst code I have ever seen (that is taking into
~~ > > account the fact that it is obfuscated as well).  In other words,
~~ > > there is no reason to fear that Perl snippet, and you have just
~~ > > wasted a tremendous amount of bandwidth.
~~ > >
~~ > > anm
~~ > > --
~~ > >
~~ > It's bad code all right. But it did try to install a "new" KDE on my
~~ > machine.
~~ >
~~ > Yes, it even pops up a new window asking me if I wanted to proceed?
~~ >
~~ 
~~ So it only affects Linux users?  Heheh ;-)

[anm@hawk ~] cat rsa.pl                                                 [pts/2]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)

Is the code you are talking about, right? This is not a Trojan,
it will not ask you if you want to install a new KDE!  As a matter
of fact, put it into a file, and run it on another text file.

[anm@hawk ~] ./rsa.pl file                                              [pts/2]
Can't rename file to <X+dfilelMLa^filelN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj: \
No such file or directory, skipping file.

Broke.  If you want the source to this idiodic program, go to:

http://www.offshore.com.ai/arms-trafficker

It is right there and it explains what it does, follow the links
and there is even a two line version.  As two your installing a
new KDE, that is due to something you did, not that program.
If you are really that concerned, you can email me and I will 
explain what each line of the code does.  To make matters worse,
the first line was #!/bin/perl!!!  Who in the hell puts perl in
/bin?  Except on Solaris where /bin and /usr/bin are linked.

UTSL && HAND,

anm
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ Andrew N. McGuire                                                      ~
~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                              ~
~ "Plan to throw one away; you will, anyhow." - Frederick P. Brooks, Jr. ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


------------------------------

Crossposted-To: 
alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.misc
From: "Andrew N. McGuire " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 16:12:22 -0500

On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Andrew N. McGuire  quoth:

~~ Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 15:58:10 -0500
~~ From: Andrew N. McGuire  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~~ Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d, comp.os.linux.setup,
~~     comp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.security, comp.os.linux.misc
~~ Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
~~ 
~~ On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, NuQ quoth:
~~ 
~~ ~~ Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 15:23:24 -0500
~~ ~~ From: NuQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~~ ~~ Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d, comp.os.linux.setup,
~~ ~~     comp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.security, comp.os.linux.misc
~~ ~~ Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
~~ ~~ 
~~ ~~ x-no-archive: yes
~~ ~~ "blowfish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
~~ ~~ news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
~~ ~~ > "Andrew N. McGuire" wrote:
~~ ~~ > >
~~ ~~ > > On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, blowfish (Alex Lam) quoth:
~~ ~~ > >
~~ ~~ > > ~~ Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 20:54:05 -0700
~~ ~~ > > ~~ From: "blowfish (Alex Lam)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~~ ~~ > > ~~ Reply-To: ..
~~ ~~ > > ~~ Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d, comp.os.linux.setup,
~~ ~~ > > ~~     omp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.security,
~~ ~~ comp.os.linux.misc
~~ ~~ > > ~~ Subject: Re: WARNING: Somebody is trojaning UseNet with Perl Script.
~~ ~~ > > ~~
~~ ~~ > >
~~ ~~ > > [ snip post, again ]
~~ ~~ > >
~~ ~~ > > Sorry for the second reply, but I have looked through the Perl
~~ ~~ > > script that is a supposed 'Trojan'.  It is not a Trojan Horse, it
~~ ~~ > > looked like familiar bad code, and it was.  It is a 3 line RSA
~~ ~~ > > encryption program written in Perl.  It is also broken and pretty
~~ ~~ > > much about the worst code I have ever seen (that is taking into
~~ ~~ > > account the fact that it is obfuscated as well).  In other words,
~~ ~~ > > there is no reason to fear that Perl snippet, and you have just
~~ ~~ > > wasted a tremendous amount of bandwidth.
~~ ~~ > >
~~ ~~ > > anm
~~ ~~ > > --
~~ ~~ > >
~~ ~~ > It's bad code all right. But it did try to install a "new" KDE on my
~~ ~~ > machine.
~~ ~~ >
~~ ~~ > Yes, it even pops up a new window asking me if I wanted to proceed?
~~ ~~ >
~~ ~~ 
~~ ~~ So it only affects Linux users?  Heheh ;-)
~~ 
~~ [anm@hawk ~] cat rsa.pl                                                 [pts/2]
~~ #!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
~~ $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
~~ lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
~~ 
~~ Is the code you are talking about, right? This is not a Trojan,
~~ it will not ask you if you want to install a new KDE!  As a matter
~~ of fact, put it into a file, and run it on another text file.
~~ 
~~ [anm@hawk ~] ./rsa.pl file                                              [pts/2]
~~ Can't rename file to <X+dfilelMLa^filelN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj: \
~~ No such file or directory, skipping file.

OK, I looked at this thing some more, and found some docs on it.

The usage is:

  rsa.pl -k=public-key -n=rsa-modulus < file > msg.rsa

That is from the full commented version, found at:

  http://www.cypherspace.org/~adam/rsa/story2.html

Still a silly program, I guess the only reason that they obfuscated
it so much, is to condense it into a signature size file, as it is
supposedly illegal to export this program out of the U.S.. Still from
my perspective, there should never be a reason to obfuscate a program
that much, unless of course you are in an obfuscation contest, or
writing JAPH's.  This is the last bit of bandwidth and time I am
willing to waste on this topic.

Regards,

anm
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ Andrew N. McGuire                                                      ~
~ [EMAIL PROTECTED]                                              ~
~ "Plan to throw one away; you will, anyhow." - Frederick P. Brooks, Jr. ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


------------------------------

From: Kyle Parfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CD writer setup question
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 21:16:23 GMT

Thanks, I don't think I will mess with kernel, its just that windows is now
refusing to boot and the win cd burning was very unstable anyhow. It seems a
bit strange that linux won't support an IDE cd-writer.

I think there is a marker for an easy to use program that automatically
takes your ide device and configs all to make your system think its scsi.
Hint hint.

Kyle

Carlos Moreno wrote:

> As far as I remember, yes, you would need to recompile your kernel,
> unless
> you have a SCSI CD-Writer.
>
>
> I hope xcdroast improves in the near future, or that some replacements
> that do work appear...  (well, maybe xcdroast does work fine, but if
> you have to be a Linux guru to make it work, then I don't consider
> that "working fine"...)
>
> Carlos
> --


------------------------------

From: Tim Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Needing help with Samba
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 16:26:35 -0700

Ok, I have found some interesting stuff out with RH6.2.

If I install RH as "Server" then Samba is installed and everything works great!
If I install RH as "Workstation using KDE" then Samba is not installed and I
can't figure out how to install it without problems.

Does anyone know why Samba won't install?
I type  "rpm -UvhF samba*.rpm"  and it shows all the hash marks and looks like a
nice install.
Then I type "rpm -q samba" and it says "package samba is not installed".

I think I've tried every combination.
Any ideas folks?


Tim Johnston wrote:

> Didn't work.  This is very frustrating!
> I'm going to try to rebuild my rpm DB.
>
> Dr. Tu Yu wrote:
>
> > Sounds like samba is not installed.   As a SU try installing Samba
> >  rpm -UvhF samba*.rpm
> >
> > Then you should be able to start samba using    /usr/sbin/samba start |
> > restart | stop
> >
> > "Tim Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > I've installed the Workstation version of Red Hat 6.2 with the KDE and
> > > I'm needing to get samba up and running.  I've read all the samba
> > > documentation I can get my hands on but I'm stuck.  Red Hat's
> > > documentation says that samba is installed by default.  Is this not
> > > true?  Here's what I've tried so far:
> > >
> > > 1) At boot time samba is not started.  I thought by default it would be
> > > running? I do not see any running processes relating to samba, i.e. smbd
> > > or nmbd.
> > >
> > > 2) I've tried both of these and they do not work:
> > >          /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start
> > >    and
> > >         smbd -D and nmbd -D
> > >
> > > 3) I looked for the log directory /var/log/samba/  but is does not
> > > exist.
> > >
> > > 4) I see that I have a smb.conf file! Why would I have a smb.conf file
> > > if samba was not installed?  I haven't made any changes yet, I want to
> > > get the daemons running first and then I'll config them.
> > >
> > > 5) I went into linuxconf (Control:Control panel:Control Service
> > > Activity) and I did not see smb as an availble service in the list for
> > > activation or deactivation.
> > >
> > > 6) I used Red Hat's KPackage (RPM:Applications:System) and I see both
> > > samba-client and samba-common.  Doesn't that mean samba is installed?
> > >
> > > 7) I ran rpm -q samba  and it says samba is not installed.
> > >
> > > 8) I ran testparm /etc/smb.conf and I get:
> > >
> > >          Load smb config files from etc/smb.conf
> > >          Processing Section "[homes]"
> > >          Processing Section "[printers]"
> > >          Load Services file OK.
> > >          ERROR: lock directory /var/lock/samba does not exist.
> > >
> > >      Why would RH config my file to point to a dir that does not exist?
> > >
> > >
> > > So is samba installed or not?  I can't figure it out!
> > >
> > > If I need to install samba could someone give me some dummy instuctions
> > > on how do do it?  I've read the HOW-TO's and make and compile and rpm's
> > > but I admit it's a bit confusing to me.  What's the difference between
> > > make and compile anyways?
> > >
> > > Any help would be greatly appreciated!!!!
> > >
> > > Tim Johnston
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >


------------------------------

From: "Thomas Dedeyne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: resolution - modeline-settings
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 21:36:35 GMT

I have a Creative Labs Banshee card with 16M RAM on it. I got the linux
drivers from the website of Creative. I know the resolutions ans refresh
rates my monitor can do...


"David Efflandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Thomas Dedeyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Can someone give me more information about the Modeline settings in the
> >XF86Config-file. The problem is that my Xwindow is running in a 320*204
> >resolution and that's not a very pretty view!! The settings of my graphic
> >card is correct. So, I want to now how to set these settings for my
monitor
> >manually...
>
> You might be able to get some help if you list video card, how much video
> RAM and monitor timings.  Without that information, anybody would be
> guessing.
>
> --
> David Efflandt  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.de-srv.com/
> http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/  http://www.berniesfloral.net/
> http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/  http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/
>



------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.setup) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************

Reply via email to