Linux-Setup Digest #492, Volume #19 Sun, 27 Aug 00 19:13:08 EDT
Contents:
HELP: Linux on Netserver LH3 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Wierd Error on Install. (Anaconda?) ("Adam H.")
Re: [Q] How to compile kernel in Debian / Storm (Jerome Mrozak)
Re: Linux, XML, and assalting Windows
Re: Taking the plunge... ("Luc Van Bogaert")
Re: Firewall for Linux (Tim Haynes)
LILO and floppy ("Terramex")
Re: HELP: Linux on Netserver LH3 (Justin Young)
Re: Debian Potato 1.2 root floppy problem (Colin Watson)
Re: autoconvert Windoze CR-LF to Unix newline? (Mandrake 7.1) (Colin Watson)
Re: Compiling GNOME - Compiler can't find GDK-Pixbuf (Colin Watson)
Re: Members of root group (Colin Watson)
Re: RH 6.2 cdrom install lost interrupt` (repo)
Re: wron major or minor version number for partitions. What am I doing wrong?
(Marcus Webb)
how to block Ctrl+Alt+Del ("Vlad Nova")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.hp.hardware,alt.os.linux.mandrake,linux.redhat.install
Subject: HELP: Linux on Netserver LH3
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 21:00:24 GMT
Hi! Is anyone running Linux on a HP Netserver LH3 server? Are you
able to boot from the hardware RAID partition? I understand that the
hardware RAID is compatible with Linux.
Thanks and regards,
Dileep Agrawal
PS. please send a copy of your response to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
------------------------------
From: "Adam H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Wierd Error on Install. (Anaconda?)
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 07:13:41 +1000
Hi,
I'm trying to install Redhat 6.2 onto a new (2nd hand) computer
I have at home, the same way I have with many other installations.
This is the first time I've encountered an error of this nature, and I
don't understand what it is. Can someone please help me:
After the selection criteria, Redhat starts to install it's packages, but
when it finishes installing the packages, I get an error message:
=====================================
Exception Occurred:
Traceback (innermost last):
File "/usr/bin/anaconda", line 342 in ?
intf.run(todo, test = test)
File "/usr/lib/anaconda/text.py", line 1165, in run
rc = apply (step[1](), step[2])
File "usr/lib/anaconda/text.py", line 702, in __call__
If todo.doinstall ():
File "/usr/lib/anaconda/tody.py", line 1252 in do Install
self.WriteConfiguration ()
=====================================
I'm trying to install this on a P 166, 2gig Hdd, 16Mb Ram.
(I've tried installing with and without the GUI, but I still get
the same error).
Thanks for ANY help...
Adam
------------------------------
From: Jerome Mrozak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: [Q] How to compile kernel in Debian / Storm
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 16:10:46 -0500
Thanks for the references. I eventually found the kernel-package stuff
on the Debian potato disk, not on the Storm disk.
Except for this APM/(recompile kernel) stuff, this Storm hail release
looks interesting.
Jerome.
Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> Below is the web page the the Debian potato kernel-package, which
> provides an automated way to compile a kernel. I run Debian, not Storm,
> so I don't know for sure if this package will be completely compatible
> with Storm Linux, although it should be:
>
> http://www.debian.org/Packages/stable/misc/kernel-package.html
>
> In any case, you will also have to install the Linux kernel source
> tree. That is what goes in /usr/src/linux.
>
> I just took a look on Storm's ftp site (ftp.stormix.com) in the "hail"
> directory, and there are two kernel-source packages there. One looks
> like the full kernel, while the other has "ide" in the package name. You
> can see them here:
>
> ftp://ftp.stormix.com/storm/dists/hail/main/binary-i386/devel/
>
> Since you are running "hail", I would assume that these packages would
> also be on your hail CD. Looks like the preferred way to install
> packages in Storm Linux is by using the Storm Package Manager. That
> should automatically handle all the package dependencies for you.
>
> You should be able to configure it to install packages from your CD, or
> directly from the Storm (or Debian) ftp site. By the way, here's the
> Storm web page for their package manager:
>
> http://www.stormix.com/products/hail/starter/stormpkg_html
>
> In addition to the kernel source, you will need several other packages
> to actually compile a kernel, including the gcc compiler, the make
> utility, and the bin86 package. That web page I gave you for the
> kernel-package package, gives you a run down on what's needed,
> recommended, and suggested.
>
> Tom
>
> Jerome Mrozak wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to try using Storm Linux on my laptop, a Debian-derived
> > distro. One problem I'm having is that apmd isn't supported in the
> > "potato" kernel. I'm having trouble finding the packages to compile it.
> >
> > For example, the Debian recommened packages for compiling is the combo
> > of "make-kpkg" and "kernel-package". I can't seem to find them on my
> > Stormix hail ISO, and wasn't able to coerce the SPS system to find them
> > on my Debian potato ISO. (I simply mounted the potato disk and told SPS
> > to Find "kernel". It appeared to use a pre-loaded list of packages,
> > rather than investigate my newly-loaded CD.)
> >
> > I also tried to find the files for "make menuconfig", "make xconfig" and
> > "make config", but with no success (most advice said to look in
> > /usr/src/linux, which didn't exist in my Stormix "install everything"
> > installation).
> >
> > So how can I add apmd support?
> >
> > TIA,
> > Jerome.
> > --
> > Jerome Mrozak "Never buy a dog and bark for yourself"
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] --"Slippery" Jim DiGriz
> > (the Stainless Steel Rat)
--
Jerome Mrozak "Never buy a dog and bark for yourself"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --"Slippery" Jim DiGriz
(the Stainless Steel Rat)
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.text.xml,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux, XML, and assalting Windows
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 14:32:48 -0700
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tad McClellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 19:27:47 +1000, Ian Pulsford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> Ian Pulsford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> >> It seems that too many people are so worked up about the XML format
that
> >> they are crediting it with magical properties.
> >
> >Yeh, there seems to be a lot of hype. I guess it's the new toy syndrome.
> ^^^^^^^
>
>
> Structured markup is not new. It is (at least) 20 *years* old.
>
> I am dumbfounded that most everybody thinks that XML is
> "something new"...
>
>
> So it isn't really "new toy" syndrome, it is more like
> "a very old toy that I just now discovered" syndrome :-)
XML is something "new"; but, it is just a new implementation of the same old
idea. Take an old idea reimplement it, give it a new name, throw in a few
new term and a lot of hype. That is all XML really is. The problem is that
too many people read the hype and don't really understand what it really is,
soon you hear about XML replacing programs. In time the reality of the
situation starts to sink in, but in the mean time what foolishness does it
generate!
I have seen all this so many times before. Some of the problem seems to be
that the neophytes discount the vaule of the wisdom of experience. So
instead of learning from us they have too make all the same mistakes that
were made before and have to learn the lessons first hand. And then there
are thoise who never learn and fall for it over and over again.
------------------------------
From: "Luc Van Bogaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Luc Van Bogaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Taking the plunge...
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 21:48:57 GMT
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 06:49:57 GMT, Edward wrote:
>For me, someone who has no experience with Unix/Linux, is this the best
>version for me? I've read of Caldera commandless type? I want to start slow
>but slowly learn... I dont' mind paying a few bucks for a boxed distribution
>that comes with a good manual.
For someone like you, just beginning with Linux but still using OS/2
(never touched M$) I have to say that I'm really impressed with
Mandrake 7.1: very easy to install and very polished and highly usable
with KDE or GNOME interface.
Luc Van Bogaert
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Haynes)
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.networking,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Firewall for Linux
Date: 27 Aug 2000 22:59:58 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald K Knepshield) writes:
[]
> PMFirewall is another one that works well. www.pmfirewall.com/PMFirewall
> interested.
I once saw the results of running it. I wasn't all that impressed[i].
What's wrong with ipchains either in a script of your own design - you
know, you, keyboard, vim or (X)emacs, DIY - or something concocted in
e.g. gfcc?
~Tim
Footnotes:
[i] I expected a deny-by-default and log-all with holes allowed and
continuations firewall. It came out with dodgy policies and excessive rules
`closing' various ports.. duh.
--
| Geek Code: GCS dpu s-:+ a-- C++++ UBLUAVHSC++++ P+++ L++ E--- W+++(--) N++
| w--- O- M-- V-- PS PGP++ t--- X+(-) b D+ G e++(*) h++(*) r--- y-
| The sun is melting over the hills, | http://piglet.is.dreaming.org/
| All our roads are waiting / To be revealed | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Terramex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LILO and floppy
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 22:14:38 GMT
Hi,
can I put my LILO on a normal floppy ?
If yes, how can I do this ? Any1 can help me , please.
the reason is that Lilo destry always my hard disk MBR.
I tried many times, and it's over 1 year that after 2 or 3 months that I
have Lilo, sometimes I have a mbr crash. Maybe it's just the hard disk, but
now I 'd like to have just lilo on a floppy and not on the mbr, nothing
really nothing else.
Thanks a lot for any help.
Bj
------------------------------
From: Justin Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.hp.hardware,alt.os.linux.mandrake,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: HELP: Linux on Netserver LH3
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 14:54:55 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi! Is anyone running Linux on a HP Netserver LH3 server? Are you
> able to boot from the hardware RAID partition? I understand that the
> hardware RAID is compatible with Linux.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Dileep Agrawal
>
Dude, read the newsgroup as well as your e-mail. That's why you have
Deja.
You are correct that there is a bug in the Mandrake 7.1 (at least the
MacMillan version included w/ Maximum PC) install program. You didn't
list an OS. However, you posted to the Mandrake group. (and several
others) It recognizes the AMI MegaRAID controller during the install.
However, the module doesn't load during the post-install boot.
Redhat 6.2 (from Cheapbytes!) does *NOT* have this problem. I've
installed it successfully.
If your heart is set on the MacMillan Mandrake 7.1 distribution and its
delicious support for ReiserFS out of the box, you can try a
workaround. Create a boot disk and copy a custom kernel which
recognizes the AMI MegaRAID to the disk. Boot from this disk. Mount
the root partition (post install) and edit the /etc/conf.modules file so
that it loads the megaraid module.
Hopefully, this helps.
--
--Justin
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson)
Subject: Re: Debian Potato 1.2 root floppy problem
Date: 27 Aug 2000 21:20:17 GMT
J.T. Wenting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:8o6k9e$la4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
[Debian 2.2 1.2Mb disk images are null?]
>> The testing images of the next version of boot-floppies still have this
>> problem. I'll be notified automatically when the bug is closed, so I'll
>> let you know as soon as that happens.
>
>Wasn't the 1.2MB option removed from Potato? If so, the fact that it is
>still there (if nulled) is the bug, and not the fact that it is nulled...
Not as far as I know; Adam Di Carlo (the boot-floppies team leader for
potato) certainly seemed to think that 1.2Mb being broken was a bug. See
for example http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69959 -
against which there's a note at the end saying that it's fixed in CVS.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"Give us a chance. We grow on you. Like fungus." - sjk25 on ucam.chat
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson)
Subject: Re: autoconvert Windoze CR-LF to Unix newline? (Mandrake 7.1)
Date: 27 Aug 2000 21:54:02 GMT
Kirby Urner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm moving this thread from comp.lang.python as it turns out to be more
>about the Linux-Windows relationship.
I'm moving it away from comp.os.linux.help, as that hasn't technically
existed for some years now :)
>Basically, a Linux user intimated there'd maybe be a way to use the
>same source code text files (Python modules with .py extension) across
>platforms (my Windoze partitions are mounted and accessible in my Linux
>partition), such that I'm not plagued by the different way of doing
>line feeds in the two OSs.
To some extent, yes. The whole thing is horribly broken, really ... :(
Mostly, I think I'd avoid hacks like conv=auto unless there's no other
way. Rewriting files on the fly feels ... ugly, somehow.
>But here's the problem: coords.py is tokenized with all these /r
>thingys at the end of every line. I think I understand the reason:
>DOS-based Windows has always used ASCII CR-LF for end of line, while
>UNIX just uses /n (newline) -- so I'm looking at all those ASCII LF
>characters, yes? Or are these CRs?
They're usually called \r and \n, in homage to C and the like, but yes.
\r is a carriage return, \n is a line feed - so Unix uses LF only.
>Now here's the question: yes, I can write a program to strip the '/r's
>out of my Windoze modules, but then they're going to be out of whack
>when I reboot into that version of Python no? So is it the case that I
>need to clone all my modules and write routines to convert back and
>forth? Or is there some more universal text format that'll let me
>store the module once and only once and share it between both OSs?
[...]
>PS: actually, having written this, I'm now rather confused. OF COURSE
>all kinds of module files out there on the net, some of which I've
>downloaded and used in Windows, were orginally written in Linux/Unix.
>CLEARLY its very possible to share the same text source between OSs.
I *believe* that the problem only exists one way round, particularly
based on what you say there (and the same situation with Perl modules,
which is where my experience is). Try keeping your modules in Unix form (LF
only) and see if you have fewer problems then. This is solely based on
my guesses about (a) Python's behaviour (it's the same code on Unix and
Windows, right?) and (b) the naturally different reactions that you get
from parsers that expect CR LF and LF, so try it out for yourself and
see if it works.
The FTP ASCII mode conversion thing that the guy on clp mentioned is
also a possibility.
>[1] installation of Mandrake-Linux was pretty smooth, as advertised,
>but I think my finger slipped at 2:30 AM or something and I found
>myself looking at a 20 gig hard drive with only the new Linux partition
>usable, all the FAT32 stuff inaccessible (gulp! -- not backed up). I
>swallowed hard, found some utility from Russia or someplace, and
>managed to change a byte code in the partition table that'd been misset
>to 85. All back to normal. Whew!
I suspect some careful use of fdisk might have solved your problem, but
you do have to know what to change things back to.
>[2] my "math through programming" (using a way better teaching language
>than Basic or C) is on-line at
>http://www.inetarena.com/~pdx4d/ocn/numeracy0.html -- a four part
>essay, with Python mods downloadable (so will Linux people see /r at
>the ends of all my lines?)
It depends on the editor or pager. vim will ignore them except for
putting "[dos]" into the status line. less ignores them entirely for me.
But quite often programs that expect LF only will get confused, and it
can occasionally be hard to figure out what's going on.
>/dev/hdc5 /mnt/win_c2 vfat user,exec,umask=0 0 0
[...]
>I modified line 7 to look like this:
>
>/dev/hdc5 /mnt/win_c2 vfat user,exec,umask=0 0 0,conv=auto 0 0
>
>but Linux choked on that, said line 7 was bad.
Um, yes, bad indeed :) Spaces or tabs separate the fields, and you need
to modify the fourth field (and definitely not add extra ones on the
end).
/dev/hdc5 /mnt/win_c2 vfat user,exec,umask=0,conv=auto 0 0
>Maybe I should go umask=auto 0 0 (pure guesswork at work -- could be
>dangerous I realize, time to do some homework).
'man 5 fstab'.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"Master," I complained, "the programmer who wrote this code is lazy!
It's a simple bug and yet he's done nothing about it." My Master asked
me, "Why, then, have you not fixed it yourself?" I was then enlightened.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: Compiling GNOME - Compiler can't find GDK-Pixbuf
Date: 27 Aug 2000 21:59:19 GMT
Ken Conroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>For some reason, after making and installing (via the included
>instructions) the gdk-pixbuf library (this is one of the few that do
>not come with a .spec file, so I just did a normal ./configure, make,
>make install) the next components to be compiled and installed (all the
>components listed before gdk-pixbuf compiled into RPMs and then
>installed without a hitch) I recieved a message telling me that the
>compiler couldn't find the gdk-pixbuf library.
The runtime library (the bit that lets you run programs linked against
the library) is not the same as the development library (the bit that
lets you compile programs linked against the library). Did you also
build and install the development library?
>My current non-default compiler options (or rather, the options used by
>the configure script) are as follows:
>MACHTYPE=i686-mandrake-linux-gnu
>HOSTTYPE=i686
>CFLAGS="-06 -fomit-frame-pointer -mpentiumpro -mcpu=pentiumpro
>-march=pentiumpro -ffast-math -fexpensive-optimizations"
Hmm. Well, I would use somewhat more conservative options, but I guess
mad optimizations are what Mandrake is about. ;)
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"Is this legal?"
"That question is OFF-TOPIC here." - alt.binaries.cracks FAQ
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Watson)
Subject: Re: Members of root group
Date: 27 Aug 2000 22:20:31 GMT
Oscar Rau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am planning to add some normal users to root group, so they can
>analyze the root logs and later on be able to start some programs that
>can be started only by root.
For logging, I recommend that you add users to some group like adm or
wheel instead, and have the logs readable by that group. Whether you add
them to the root group or not, they won't be able to start programs that
require you to be the root *user* to start.
>If I do so, will this user be the same as root?
>Can he/she create and delete filesystems or devices?
No and no. You need to learn more about Unix permissions; read 'man
chmod' for an introduction. Files and directories have permission flags
governing read, write, and execute privileges for the user owning the
file/directory, the group to which the file/directory is assigned, and
everyone else. The root user and the root group are two completely
different things, so don't confuse the two. In particular, privileges to
do things like mounting filesystems are normally only given to the root
user.
If you want users to be able to mount filesystems, you should look into
the 'user', 'users', and 'owner' options in /etc/fstab and decide which
you need; read 'man mount' and 'man fstab'.
If you want users to be able to acquire other bits of root-ish
privileges, then you should look at sudo. It gives an administrator much
more control than crudely trying to make users root-equivalent.
--
Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"Master," I complained, "the programmer who wrote this code is lazy!
It's a simple bug and yet he's done nothing about it." My Master asked
me, "Why, then, have you not fixed it yourself?" I was then enlightened.
------------------------------
From: repo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH 6.2 cdrom install lost interrupt`
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 22:32:26 +0000
Jonathan Friedman wrote:
>
> I'm new to the linux world.
>
> I have a machine with the following hardware
>
> 486 dx/2 50
> 40MB RAM
> 850 MB HD (currently has W95 - but I don't care if that goes poof < good
> ridence)
> 2MB ATI VLB Video card
> IDE CDROM drive (Creative - but actually a Goldstar - 580?)
>
> The HD is primary master, CDROM is secondary master.
>
> I want to install RH 6.2 . I downloaded and burned the iso distribution for
> i386 architecture to CD. I got the latest Boot image and updates image disk
> from the redhat ftp site. When I go to install, however, It always gets
> through the first few screens about keyboard, language, etc... then it
> accesses the CDROM (at which point I can switch over to the bash window and
> ls the cdrom correctly) then after accessing the cdrom the debug window
> (cntrl-alt-f4) shows "<4>hdc: lost interrupt" and will redisplay this
> message every second until it fills the screen. At this point the
> installation is frozen and does not copy any files or do anything even
> though I can still switch around screens. If I go to bash at this point ls
> just hangs. I have looked on the internet for a fix. I'm sure other people
> have had this problem, but I can not seem to find any documentation. Please
> help. Thanks.
>
> --
> Jonathan
> Atlanta, GA 30332
Jonathan
Here are the errocodes:
L<nn> nn represents one of 16 disk-error codes.
LI The second-stage boot loader loaded, but could not run.
LIL The descriptor table could not be read.
LIL? The second-stage boot loader loaded at an incorrect address.
LIL- LILO found a corrupt descriptor table.
LILO LILO ran successfully.
Disk error codes can indicate problems such as an open floppy door, a
drive timeout, a controller error, a media problem, a BIOS error, or
even transient read problems (which can be overcome by rebooting).
Overall, some common problems with LILO include
Not rerunning /sbin/lilo following a kernel change
Incorrect use of /sbin/lilo in creating a new boot map
Installing and booting Linux from a very large (2GB+) partition
Installing another operating system (such as Windows 95, which
overwrites the MBR) after installing Linux and LILO
Errors in/etc/lilo.conf after manual edits
A corrupted MBR
Installation of LILO in a Linux swap partition (which should be
impossible)
A missing Linux kernel image (error in/etc/lilo.conf)
Installing Linux on and booting from a DOS partition and then
defragmenting the DOS partition
--
Good Luck
Repo
ICQ 69588792
http://www.crosswinds.net/~beginnerslinux/
http://beginnerslinux.org/
Redhat 6.0 Kernel 2.2.5-15
12:30am up 1 day, 14 min, 1 user, load average: 0.36, 0.95, 0.84
Mon Aug 28 00:30:36 CEST 2000
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Webb)
Subject: Re: wron major or minor version number for partitions. What am I doing wrong?
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 22:42:22 GMT
On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 18:06:19 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Marcus Webb) wrote:
I've now tried installing from boot floppies and the same problem
still exists. I jsut thought I'd add that here to stop anyone
answering with the same thought.
Is there a wy for correcting the /dev/hda? file to reflect the
necessary major or minor version numbers and if not are there any
other suggestions out there in LinuxLand.
Knowing all you lovely linux types are hardware hackers of the highest
order and will come up with a solution soon.
Regards
Marcus
>Hi there
>
>Hoping that someone here can help. I have a home built system that has
>two SCSI CD Drives and an IDE Hard drive. The partitioning work has
>all been done and Linux installs from a bootable CD in either drive -
>no probs there. I mount the partitions I want when setting up under
>the install, but when I reboot if I try to mount any partition other
>than the Linux ones (i.e. my Windoze 98 stuff) I get the error "wrong
>major or minor version number". This is very frustrating.
>
>I can reinstall if necessary to fix this, so am not too fussed by the
>situation, but it would be nice to get it fixed. Any suggestions?
>
>I can use RedHat, SuSE, Mandrake or TurboLinux to install. and they
>all produce the same probs.
>
>Regards
>
>Marcus
------------------------------
From: "Vlad Nova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to block Ctrl+Alt+Del
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 17:17:11 +0400
Hi All !
Can you help me to make unavailable to reboot with Ctrl+Alt+Del ?
Thanx in advance, All !
Vlad
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.setup) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
