Linux-Setup Digest #803, Volume #19              Tue, 10 Oct 00 22:13:09 EDT

Contents:
  soffice51 install ("C. Shen")
  Re: Helix/Gnome GDM - Dual Monitor Support
  Re: Multi head gnome config?
  Re: Cable modem, ethernet, and DHCP (Andrey Vlasov)
  Re: trouble compiling a kernel  RH7 (Hal Burgiss)
  Re: Problem installing Redhat 7.0 (Bob Plested)
  Re: A new directory hierarchy standard - need opinions (Todd Knarr)
  Re: LILO frezes after PartitionMagic moves LINUX partitions 
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  help setting up newsreader... (David. E. Goble)
  Re: help setting up newsreader... (raf)
  Re: help setting up newsreader... (Zebee Johnstone)
  Re: soffice51 install (E J)
  Re: Lilo booting problem? (E J)
  Re: HD Upgrade Question (E J)
  Re: Making the Backspace key work using a remote X server (Thomas Dickey)
  Re: I NEED A JOB!! (Herb Stein)
  Re: Server refused ftp (Herb Stein)
  ###How to Install Linux Mandrake??### ("Learner")
  LILO Setup in RH 7.0 ("Tom Ratrie")
  Re: HD Upgrade Question (Paul Lew)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "C. Shen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: soffice51 install
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:09:08 -0500

I had install a SUN office (soffice51) on my linux machine. I installed
it as a root, but now I can not use it as a normal user. When I login as
a normal user, under xterm, I enter "soffice", and wait for a while(it
seems it is runing under background), but nothing happend. If I change
into root, I can run it very well.
what's wrong with my configuration?

Thanks for your help.

chao


------------------------------

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Helix/Gnome GDM - Dual Monitor Support
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:30:07 -0000

Not sure if my last reply got posted.

It sound like you were running XF86R4 with xinerama enabled.

Add "+xinerama" to the server lines at the end of the file
/etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf.

e.g.
        [servers]
        0=/usr/bin/X11/X +xinerama  

rbraud wrote:
> 
> 
> I just installed Helix/Gnome and it looks great. I have two monitors
> hooked up. Prior to installing Gnome the two monitors worked as one
> desktop. After instlling Helix/Gnome I now have two separate desktops
> one on each monitor.
> 
> How do I get gdm to fire off one desktop spread across both monitors.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.


--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multi head gnome config?
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:30:09 -0000

Try  using Xfree86R4. Once you have this installed (Which you may already
haveif X is starting on both displays), make X start with the +xinerama
option, this will give you one physical screen with gnome running across
both displays.

Running with two seperate heads caused me no end of problems, xfce and
enlightenment were about the only two window managers that worked well with
this configuration.
Tom wrote:
> 
> 
> Anyone know how to configure gnome to start a desktop
> on each of my screens in a two head configuration?
> 
> I have gdm running on screen 0.  I can log in and gnome
> starts on head 0, but nothing runs on head 1.
> 
> Thanks -
> 
> 
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.


--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/

------------------------------

From: Andrey Vlasov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.os.linux.mandrake,comp.os.linux.networking,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Cable modem, ethernet, and DHCP
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:51:39 -0700

Hi there,

I had a similar problem with configuration of ADSL connection.
I could not configure it manualy as well. Problem was solved
as only I disabled P-n-P BIOS option without any my
intervention.

Andrey


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal Burgiss)
Subject: Re: trouble compiling a kernel  RH7
Reply-To: Hal Burgiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 22:59:12 GMT

On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 23:32:34 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <8s0015$ncg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "havesum2"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> im using an abit kt7 750 thunderbird and i cant get it to compile a
>> kernel with RH7 it works fine with 6.2 anyone else have this problem.
>> kernel ver. 2.2.17 thanks in advance for any help, havesum2
>
>I guess every RH7.0 user has.
>
>AFAIK its got something to do wirth the new gcc (etc) version.
>
>uninstalling the mysterious kgcc rpm and replacing the kernel source rpm
>with a tarball version helpes a bit.
>You still get warnings but the kernel compiles and runs.

Huh? kgcc is the one you want for kernel compiling. It's there
explicitly for compatibility, and just for this reason. Use gcc for most
everything else.

Near the top of the kernel makefile find:

AS      =$(CROSS_COMPILE)as
LD      =$(CROSS_COMPILE)ld
CC      =$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I$(HPATH)

Substitute kgcc there for gcc. Or get one of the later 2.2.18pre
kernels. It does this automagically.

-- 
Hal B
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

------------------------------

From: Bob Plested <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem installing Redhat 7.0
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:09:16 -0700

Sounds like your ZIP might be listed in /etc/fstab as an automount device. Undo
that and see what happens.

Bob

"Victor S. Miller" wrote:

> >>>>> "Mogens" == Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mogens> "Victor S. Miller" wrote:
> >>  I have a Dell M166s (Pentium MMX) which is now running Win 95.  I
> >> got redhat 7.0, and am trying to install it.  I successfully boots
> >> from the CDROM, and starts running -- correctly detecting most of
> >> the hardware, however, it gets hung up spewing endless copies of
> >> the following line:
> >>
> >> hdb: lost interrupt
>
> Mogens> Please list what you have of IDE equipment.
>
> Mogens> hdb is the slave on the primary IDE controller. Is this your
> Mogens> CDROM drive? Is it actually set as slave?
>
> Mogens, it turns out that hdb is my internal IDE Zip 100.  I found
> that as long as there is a disk in the drive when I boot up I have no
> problems.  This seems a bit hokey.  It would be nice to fix it so that
> wasn't necessary.  Some short history: when I bought the computer from
> Dell, I had peculiar troubles in Win 95 with Norton Rescue.  A lot of
> investigation showed that contrary to what Iomega recommends, that the
> BIOS had described the disk, instead of saying "None".  When I changed
> it to none, then Windows saw the disk as what it should be - complete
> with sensing whether or not there's a disk there (and seeing it as a
> removable disk).  It seems that Redhat doesn't do that.
>
> --
> Victor S. Miller     | " ... Meanwhile, those of us who can compute can hardly
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]    | be expected to keep writing papers saying 'I can do the
> CCR, Princeton, NJ   | following useless calculation in 2 seconds', and indeed
>     08540 USA        | what editor would publish them?"  -- Oliver Atkin


------------------------------

From: Todd Knarr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: Re: A new directory hierarchy standard - need opinions
Date: 11 Oct 2000 00:31:03 GMT

In comp.os.linux.development.system <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Equinox 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   1) A lot of cruft that should be stored elsewhere seems to have
>      collected in /usr/ .  Shouldn't the directory containing include
>      files be under a src/ directory somewhere?

Nope. Think a second. src/ contains source code. Where do the include
files for, say, glibc go if you don't have the source code for glibc
installed ( this would be most machines )? This doesn't show up when
thinking about applications but does show up in the set of files needed
to use a library vs. the set of files needed to build the library in the
first place.

>   2) /opt/ seems to be a "Program Files"-like directory [please excuse
>      the reference to Windoze] for the installation of software
>      packages that don't fit neatly into the /usr/* and /usr/local/*
>      hierarchies.  Why, then, do we have /opt/bin/ , /opt/lib/ , and
>      so forth?

Convention. /opt is broken down per-package. If you aren't referencing
the /opt/{package} directories directly, you usually make a link from
/usr/{bin|lib|...} ( or /usr/local/{bin|lib|...} to the appropriate files
under /opt.

Frankly I find /opt a kludge, but it's a reasonable solution when
dealing with packages that like to own their entire directory tree
and don't co-exist well in the same directories as other packages.

>   3) Another /opt/ issue... /opt/ is described in section 3.8 of the
>      current FHS as a place for "add-on application software
>      packages".  I interpret "add-on" to mean "not essential to system
>      operation".  In light of this, why do we have /opt/ , instead of
>      /usr/opt/ and /usr/local/opt/ ?

Because either would be exactly equivalent to /opt?

>   4) All special allowances for X11 need to be done away with.  It's
>      just another program, but its current convoluted directory
>      structure makes configuration and administration needlessly
>      difficult.  Gathering up this monster's sprawling pieces and
>      sticking them into /usr/opt/X11R6/ might not be a bad idea.

Already done, isn't it? At least on my system everything for X11 lives
under /usr/X11R6 except for the config files under /etc/X11.

-- 
If it's a hobby for me and a job for you, why are you doing such a shoddy
job of it?
                                -- Linus Torvalds

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: redhat.general,linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: LILO frezes after PartitionMagic moves LINUX partitions
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 00:32:42 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:35:00 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >This might be a FAQ.
> >I have installed RH5.2 (dual boot with Win95) and recently I moved
all
> >my LINUX partition with PartitionMagic.  When I rebooted the PC
<snip>....
>
> If you know what partition root is now ( I guess you can tell with
> partition magic?) you might be able to just do
>
> LILO:  linux root=/dev/hda? (? is the number of the partition)
>
> If that boots you, then you can edit /etc/lilo.conf so that
> in the image section you have root=/dev/hda? instead of the old
> partition.  Then you can run 'lilo' and that will put the proper
> info into the mbr.  You will also need to edit /etc/fstab to indicate
> the proper partition for root and whatever else may have changed
> like swap.
>
> If that doesn't boot you, you can do
>
> linux rescue at the boot prompt on the 6.0 cdrom.  Then
>
> mkdir /mnt/rootdir
> mount -t ext2 /dev/hda?  /mnt/rootdir
> chroot /mnt/rootdir
>
> and then do the editing and running of lilo and so on above.
>
> If you don't know what is what with the partitions, after you get in
> rescue mode, do
>
> fdisk /dev/hda
>
> and figure out what partition is / and swap by the size.  I guess
> you figured out that the numbers shifted.
Hi,
I have tried the RH6.0 CD and while reading the instructions it went
into 'installation' mode.  Anyway, I followed the prompts and ended
updating my RH5.2 to 6.0.  I have located the LINUX partition as hda6,
and chose that as the LILO site instead of MBR.

Now, Win95 can boot but LINUX would not.  :-(
I think I will get LILO to reconize the location of the root as hda6
LILO:  linux root=/dev/hda6
and proceed to edit /etc/lilo.conf so that in the image section I will
have root=/dev/hda6

While I am doing all this, I am considering to upgrade Win95 to Win2k.
Is there anything to look out for other than moving LILO to hda6?

I understand that the Win2k installation will trash my MBR.  :-P

Thanks for the advice.

Any other opnions will be appreciated.  Thanks in advance.

:-)


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

------------------------------

From: goble@gtech (David. E. Goble)
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,aus.computers.linux
Subject: help setting up newsreader...
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 00:48:58 GMT
Reply-To: goble@gtech

Hi All;

Iam running redhat 6.2 server install.

I have managed to set it up to be able to connect to my ISP, to
fetchmail and to browse the web.

I have even managed to setup a local newsgroup using innd and pine. My
question is how can I set it up so that I can download the newsgroups
from my ISPs news-server to my local news server?

At the moment I need to type innd very time to get innd started, how
can I automate this?

Also I tried setting up slrn, but it keeps saying it can not find a
hostname or that I need to setenv NNTPSERVER environment variable.

pine uses (from memory)

ntp-server: gtech/service=NNTP

My hosts file is 

127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain gtech

If you need more info let me know....
--Regards       David. E. Goble
             goble [AT] kin.net.au
          http://www.kin.net.au/goble
Po Box 648 Kingscote, Kangaroo Island, SA 5223

------------------------------

From: raf@chun's_reef.org (raf)
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: help setting up newsreader...
Reply-To: cat /dev/null > $MAIL
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 00:58:03 GMT

On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 00:48:58 GMT, David. E. Goble wrote:
>Hi All;
>
>Also I tried setting up slrn, but it keeps saying it can not find a
>hostname or that I need to setenv NNTPSERVER environment variable.
>
Look for a .profile(home directory) and add 

export NNTPSERVER=your.news.server 

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Zebee Johnstone)
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: help setting up newsreader...
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 01:24:40 GMT

In aus.computers.linux on Wed, 11 Oct 2000 00:48:58 GMT
David. E. Goble <goble@gtech> wrote:
>
>I have even managed to setup a local newsgroup using innd and pine. My
>question is how can I set it up so that I can download the newsgroups
>from my ISPs news-server to my local news server?

Do a google search (www.google.com) on leafnode or slrnpull.

Any other method requires your ISP to agree to feed you, it's easier
to use something like slrnpull especially if you are using slrn.

>At the moment I need to type innd very time to get innd started, how
>can I automate this?

Same way everything else is automated, write a script to put in
/etc/rc.d/init.d and a link in one of the startup directories (see man
init).  I usually copy the lpd script and change the appropriate bits.

If that's too hard, then put 
        /bin/innd &
in /etc/rc.d/rc.local.
(using the right path of course)


>Also I tried setting up slrn, but it keeps saying it can not find a
>hostname or that I need to setenv NNTPSERVER environment variable.

Well, give it one or the other :)

In your .slrnrc file, try a line like
nnrpaccess "news.myisp.com.au" 

where news.myisp.com.au is the name of your ISP's news server.

Or the name of whichever news server you are using, in your case
gtech?


See the man page for slrn, and the default .slrnrc which can be found
on the web or somewhere like /usr/lib/slrn/slrn.rc

Zebee

------------------------------

From: E J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: soffice51 install
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:32:17 -0700

You have to install star office as a non-root and it installs in your home
directory.

"C. Shen" wrote:

> I had install a SUN office (soffice51) on my linux machine. I installed
> it as a root, but now I can not use it as a normal user. When I login as
> a normal user, under xterm, I enter "soffice", and wait for a while(it
> seems it is runing under background), but nothing happend. If I change
> into root, I can run it very well.
> what's wrong with my configuration?
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> chao


------------------------------

From: E J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Lilo booting problem?
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:39:02 -0700

I hope you created a Windows Startup Disk.
Put in the Windows Startup Disk in your floppy.
Boot
type the following:
A> fdisk /mbr

I think  you need to create a 16M linux "/boot" partition at the beginning
of the hard drive.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi all !
> I'm a new bie. I have just installed RedHat 6.2 to my system. My system
> run on AMD-K6. I can install RedHat to my system. But when I re-start,
> the following error appear:
> "LI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
> 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
> 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01
> 01 ....."
> and it keep scrolling down.
>
> One guy point out that it might be something wrong with my boot
> partition and suggest  using "Fdisk /MBR" to restore fresh Master Boot
> Record then re-install RedHat. I've try it but it still doesn't work at
> all.
>
> Could you pls explain this problem in more detail for me ?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.


------------------------------

From: E J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HD Upgrade Question
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:44:56 -0700

On my new drive, I did a minimal linux install.
I booted into single user mode.
I mounted the old drive.
# mount /dev/hdc /mnt/harddisk  # mount old drive
# cp -a /mnt/harddisk/bin /bin
# # skipped copy /boot
# cp -a /mnt/harddisk/dev /dev
# # continue with the rest, but skip the /proc



Bill Phillips wrote:

> Running Mandrake 7.0
>
> We're planning to upgrade the box, faster CPU, bigger drive(s).
>
> Currently running on two really old HDs, / one one, /home on the
> other. I forget which one I put the swap on.
>
> I imagine the new system will have one large HD, don't know yet for
> sure. We could probably leave one or both of the old drives in the
> box, as they are nearly worthless (OTOH, if we can take them out, I
> might be able to bring one home :-)).
>
> Got no eyes for doing a complete reinstall if it can be avoided, plus
> there is the problem of moving over all the data files from the old
> drives (that being the biggie here).
>
> I'll be looking around for HD cloning utilities, etc., but thought it
> would be smart to ask here first ... since I'm sure some of you have
> had to do this already.


------------------------------

From: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Making the Backspace key work using a remote X server
Date: 11 Oct 2000 01:47:42 GMT

Peter Mayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried all four combinations of "Backarrow Key (BS/DEL)" and "Delete is
> DEL" from the menu, and none of them have any effect.

> The only thing that works is

>     XTerm*vt100.translations: #override <Key>Delete: string(0x7f)

if you have translations set for the keys, it'll override the builtin
functionality.  (other than that, I don't know why it wouldn't work for you).

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com

------------------------------

From: Herb Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: I NEED A JOB!!
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:50:35 -0500

Maybe we ought to talk.

Blaine McDonnell wrote:

> I have head hunters calling me all the time looking to pay 60-90K (in St
> Louis, MO) for Solaris SysAdmins or Perl Programmers - you need a couple of
> years experience though.
>
> "Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:8rujfg$lcb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Pavel Zaitsev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Linux programmers dont get paid alot. Live with it. ;-)
> >
> > No? Not my experience - walked straight out of university at 21 into a
> > Unix programming job that pays several thousand pounds a year higher
> > than the average for computer scientists. My best friend from university
> > did exactly the same in a different company. I'd say the opportunities
> > for people who know their way around Linux/Unix, C, Perl, and
> > what-have-you are better now than they have been for many years.
> >
> > --
> > Colin Watson                                     [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > "Then hast thou joined the ARPANET? / Oh come to me, my bankrupt boy!
> >  Quick, call the NIC! Send RFCs! / He chortled in his joy." - RFC 527




------------------------------

From: Herb Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Server refused ftp
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:53:04 -0500

Start by not allowing anonymous ftp

Henry W Meyerding wrote:

> On RedHat 6.2... When I anonymously ftp to the box and try to send a
> file, it says permission refused by server (upload).  How do i configure
> it so that I can send files as well as serve them?
>
> Thanks
>
> HWM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




------------------------------

From: "Learner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ###How to Install Linux Mandrake??###
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 01:57:11 GMT

i am running win Me, but i want to install Linux Mandrake
I used partition magic to create two partitions for Linux
first is the Linux Ext2 partition and the other is the Swap partition. They
both are logical partition. During the setup process, it requires me to
create a root in the Linux ext2 partition, i don't quiet understand what
does it mean.
does anyone can tell me? it is in the partition setup part.

Please Help~



------------------------------

From: "Tom Ratrie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LILO Setup in RH 7.0
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 21:59:09 -0400

Hello,

I was wondering if someone could help me configure my LILO.CONF file
properly.
I have a UDMA 66 controller w/ 2 - 20g drives attached to it.  In order for
me to get RH 7 installed I had to specify
IDE2=0xd400,0xd800 IDE3=0xdc00, 0xe000 during the installation and
everything went fine....but....
when it got to the part about where to put LILO I forgot to add these
parameters during the install....soooo....
Now everytime I want to boot RH 7, I have to CTRL-X to the BOOT: prompt and
type these parms in...

Now I did a little digging and discovered that you can add such parms to the
LILO.CONF file located in the ETC directory.
Well, I've tried adding the line:

append="ide2=0xd400,0xd800 ide3=0xdc00"

to the LILO.CONF file but everytime I boot linux, it halts saying it can't
load the kernal.  I end up having to drop to the BOOT: propmt and manually
entering the parms.  Its as if it doesn't even recognize the append line.  I
have tried adding it to both the beginning of the file and to the linux
stanza.  It seems no matter where I put this in the file, it doesn't have
any effect.

Any, suggestions?


Thanks,
Tom



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Lew)
Subject: Re: HD Upgrade Question
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 02:06:45 GMT

See etc.....

The Hard Disk Upgrade Mini How-To has been updated. The new version is
number 2.11, dated 13 April 2000.

This document explains how to copy, or migrate, a Linux system from one
hard disk to another, for example when replacing a small hard disk with
a larger one. It has been tested with Red Hat 6.0, Debian 2.1, Slackware
3.5 and SuSE 6.2, and contains specific instructions for each of these
distributions.

The Mini How-To is currently available at the co-author's WWW site at:

http://www.storm.ca/~yan/Hard-Disk-Upgrade.html
    (HTML version)

http://www.storm.ca/~yan/Hard-Disk-Upgrade
    (plain text)

It will soon be available from the Linux Documentation Project archives
at:

http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Hard-Disk-Upgrade.html
    (HTML version)

http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/mini/Hard-Disk-Upgrade
    (plain text)

and all LDP mirrors.



On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:44:56 -0700, E J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On my new drive, I did a minimal linux install.
>I booted into single user mode.
>I mounted the old drive.
># mount /dev/hdc /mnt/harddisk  # mount old drive
># cp -a /mnt/harddisk/bin /bin
># # skipped copy /boot
># cp -a /mnt/harddisk/dev /dev
># # continue with the rest, but skip the /proc
>
>
>
>Bill Phillips wrote:
>
>> Running Mandrake 7.0
>>
>> We're planning to upgrade the box, faster CPU, bigger drive(s).
>>
>> Currently running on two really old HDs, / one one, /home on the
>> other. I forget which one I put the swap on.
>>
>> I imagine the new system will have one large HD, don't know yet for
>> sure. We could probably leave one or both of the old drives in the
>> box, as they are nearly worthless (OTOH, if we can take them out, I
>> might be able to bring one home :-)).
>>
>> Got no eyes for doing a complete reinstall if it can be avoided, plus
>> there is the problem of moving over all the data files from the old
>> drives (that being the biggie here).
>>
>> I'll be looking around for HD cloning utilities, etc., but thought it
>> would be smart to ask here first ... since I'm sure some of you have
>> had to do this already.
>

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.setup) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************

Reply via email to