Linux-Setup Digest #456, Volume #20 Sat, 20 Jan 01 01:13:12 EST
Contents:
Re: iso image files not found during installation! (Marcell Stoer)
Re: iso file not working (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?=)
Re: 2.4 module compile RH7 (Steve Martin)
Re: eth0 interface not found ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: RH version stability (Steve Martin)
Re: RH version stability (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?=)
Kdevelop not working ("Roy F. Cabaniss")
Re: RH version stability (David)
Cluster Idea ("rova")
Kernel 2.4 ("Sri Panyam")
Re: HOWTO on setting up disk partitions on installation - is there one? (Kelvin Chow)
Re: 'force user' in linux ? (David Efflandt)
Re: Kernel 2.4 (Tony Reed)
Re: Ftp Daemon (David Efflandt)
Re: HP LaserJet 4 configuration issue (David Efflandt)
Re: insmod problems . . . (David Efflandt)
Re: LILO in MBR; primary partition for WIndows? (David Efflandt)
Aligning Screen in Red Hat 7? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Config DNS for forward how? ("DJM")
Re: Ftp Daemon (Stephane)
Which distro has kernel 2.4, XFree86 4.0.2, & KDE 2.0 ? (Arctic Storm)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Marcell Stoer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: iso image files not found during installation!
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 15:34:28 -0800
Did you burn them as iso images (ie select that option in your burner
software)? If you just burn the iso files as is, you will have a CD with the
image file on it, but not the files contained within the image. This is not an
uncommon mistake unfortunately. I had no problem downloading, burning and
installing RH7.
Marcell
futurewei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to install RedHat linux 7.0 on my system. When I select the cdrom
> that contains the CD, an error message, "no image file found on the cdrom".
>
> I download the iso images from a mirror site and burned it on 2 CDs.
>
> Do I have to extract the file or what ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Futureman
------------------------------
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: iso file not working
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 02:35:25 +0100
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, futurewei wrote:
> is the iso file have to be extract?
An iso file cannot be extracted. You can burn it directly. Most burning
programs have something like 'create cd from iso image' or 'create cd
from image file'.
With cdrecord, you can do 'cdrecord -v -data -dev=<your_device> speed=2
<iso-file>'.
Rasmus B�g Hansen
------------------------------
From: Steve Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,redhat.general
Subject: Re: 2.4 module compile RH7
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:58:30 GMT
Jeff Moore wrote:
> Now I am compiling the 2.4 kernel and modules and it compiles the kernel
> but not the modules.
> installed the updates for gcc 2.96, glibc 2.2 as per redhat
> downloaded kernel source 2.4 from kernel.org and installed by directions
> there
Did you update modutils? The old modutils won't work with 2.4 kernel,
as the modules tree layout is different. See Documentation/Changes
for details.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: eth0 interface not found
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 01:52:53 GMT
Thanks alot, worked like a charm. Hehheh, didn't even realize i put
in6.3, what was i thinking?
In article <949peg$k2e$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> I have just recently installed Red Hat 7.0. The problem is that I
> can't get a network connection. I'm using a new Linksys card that
> never had any problems when using RH 6.3 but now it is not being
> detected. If I try to use netconf and enable dhcp, i get a "network
> device missing" error message. In my RH6.3 book it says to install
> additional network interfaces I have to edit /sbin/lilo.conf and add a
> line similar to this: append="ether=0,0,eth0"
> (sorry, not near book to remember exact command). When I try to
reload
> this config script I get an invalid syntax error where this line is,
so
> i'm infering that something has changed since 6.3. Granted, I'm not a
> Linux Wiz yet and that is why I'm asking for help.
> thanks for you time.
>
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: Steve Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH version stability
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 02:02:05 GMT
ozetechnology wrote:
> In short.
>
> 7.0 Not good.
> 6.2 rock solid.
> 6.1 never seen it, I went from 5.2 to 6.2.
My $0.02 worth; another vote for RH6.2. Running it
here with no problems, tried 7.0, too many problems.
Red Hat won't be in business much longer if this is
the best they can do. Goes to prove the old adage
"never install software that ends in zero".
BTW, upgrading RH6.2 to XFree86 4 and kernel 2.4.0
went relatively painlessly here (just be sure to
RTFM in both cases, especially with the kernel).
------------------------------
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rasmus_B=F8g_Hansen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH version stability
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 03:21:33 +0100
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Steve Martin wrote:
> ozetechnology wrote:
>
> > In short.
> >
> > 7.0 Not good.
> > 6.2 rock solid.
> > 6.1 never seen it, I went from 5.2 to 6.2.
>
> My $0.02 worth; another vote for RH6.2. Running it
> here with no problems, tried 7.0, too many problems.
> Red Hat won't be in business much longer if this is
> the best they can do. Goes to prove the old adage
> "never install software that ends in zero".
RedHat 7.0 is pretty much ok when all updates have been applied and a
decent C/C++ compiler (eg. 2.95.2) has been installed.
I run run it now without problems.
I agree, however, that RedHat should make a better effort. Such
as putting a glibc beta (numerous bugs have been fixed - far too many to
make the beta a release) and a non-working compiler in seems horrible to
me.
And even when gcc is upgraded to their lates update, it broke gawk, made
my 2.4.0 kernel go oops etc.
So my opinion in short: 7.0 is ok when upgraded to the latest bugfixes -
but out of the box it isn't.
Rasmus B�g Hansen
------------------------------
From: "Roy F. Cabaniss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Kdevelop not working
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 02:31:58 GMT
Was just starting to use kdevelop and got it fired up. Copied the traditional
c++ hello world program. Tried to compile. Tried to build. When I tried it,
what follows was the message.
gmake ***No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop
***Failed***
I tried it with the make also. So, any ideas why kdevelop, when it is trying
to run a make, is not working on the code in it's editing winndow?
--
Dr. Roy F. Cabaniss 9704-048
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 26744150
CST I Tappa Vein
------------------------------
From: David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH version stability
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 03:14:20 GMT
Steve Martin wrote:
>
> ozetechnology wrote:
>
> > In short.
> >
> > 7.0 Not good.
> > 6.2 rock solid.
> > 6.1 never seen it, I went from 5.2 to 6.2.
>
Another vote for RH6.2. Running it here with no problems. Be sure to get
any needed updates though.
--
Confucius say: He who play in root, eventually kill tree.
Registered with the Linux Counter. http://counter.li.org
ID # 123538
Completed more W/U's than 99.004% of seti users. +/- 0.01%
------------------------------
From: "rova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cluster Idea
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:58:57 +0800
I want to implement a linux cluster with the following setup:
1. A base implementation of 6 node
(all Pentium 3 650mhz, 64 mb RAM, 10GB HD IDE)
2. To be expanded incrementally with our old 486 workstations.
My idea is to configure all our workstations as a node of the cluster with
the purpose of standardising on SUN StarOffice for all our desktop users in
the our office.
My understanding is that a cluster is like a supercomputer so that
StarOffice will run on a 486 node using the resources of the whole cluster.
Will this work?
Thanks,
ROmeo V. Alvarez
Data and Network Management
------------------------------
From: "Sri Panyam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Kernel 2.4
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:52:30 +1100
Hi
I just compiled version 2.4 of the kernel and was able to create a boot
iamge successfully :- bzImage. I copied it to the /boot and updated
lilo.conf to the following (after copying bzImage to /boot/bzImage.myker):
**************
boot=/dev/hda
map=/boot/map
install=/boot/boot.b
prompt
timeout=50
linear
default=myker
image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.14-5.0
label=linux
read-only
root=/dev/hda1
image=/boot/bzImage.myker
label=myker
read-only
root=/dev/hda1
*****************
However, at the lilo prompt, when i select "myker" as the image, it prints
the following and hangs up:
**************
loading myker.....
Uncompressing linux ... Ok booting ...
**************
Has any one else come up with this. How can i fix this:
Thanks In Advance
Sri
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kelvin Chow)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: HOWTO on setting up disk partitions on installation - is there one?
Date: 20 Jan 2001 03:32:36 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Neal,
It's a tough decision isn't it? You can read all you want and you
would still end up thinking is this really what you want.
Anyways, partitioning a drive is very much a personal preference.
Even if you follow some of the recommendation from the HOWTO's or
FAQ's you still might feel that this is not quite what I wanted.
There is no right way of doing things when it comes to partitioning
your drive.
Saying that however, I would still suggest you follow the
recommendations on the HOWTO's or FAQ's and try it out for a while.
You can then later change your setting again (something a Linux junkie
often do).
I am using a 45G, and the way I partitioned is as follows:
/ 500M
/boot 15M
/tmp 2G
/usr 4G
/home 8G
/home/ftp/incoming 2G
/tftp 2G
/iso 8G
/var 2G
/extra <the rest>
Hope this offer some comfort, and don't be afraid to do the
partitioning.
Regards.
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 01:51:25 GMT, Neal Lippman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am a relative Linux newbie, about to install Linux on a new system with a
>45GB harddrive. I have been spending (probably too much) time thinking about
>how to set up the disk paritions for the install. Although there is some
>info out there on partitioning, including HowTo's that talk about large
>disks and about disk partitioning in general, I cannot find anything that
>really goes into how to make the decisions on what partitions one should
>create for a new system being used for various purposes (eg server,
>workstation, etc).
>
>Some decisions seem reasonably easy, like putting /home onto its own
>partition, esp. if you might have more than one OS installed and want to
>mount your user directories to each booted OS. Likewise, you might want to
>put /var into its own partition on a server, which would limit the ability
>of the log files to overwhelm the disk under a server attack, but then if
>you boot more than one Linux distro for some reason and they all share the
>same /var, then the logs of one overright the logs of the other, so maybe
>each root partition should contain its own /var tree...and so on.
>
>Does anyone know of a document that addresses these issues and can walk a
>newbie through making these decisions? If not, does this seem worth a HowTo?
>I know I would find that interesting, and would take on writing it up if
>others with more expertise than I contributing their thoughts and
>experience.
>
>Neal
>
>
--
Kelvin Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...please remove NOSPAM when replying
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: 'force user' in linux ?
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 04:18:10 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Todd Sargent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Why? Use text for Unix/Linux/Perl newsgroups.
>I don't know of a way to force new files in a directory to have the same owner,
>but there is a way to have them have the same group owner. The setgid bit.
>With the setgid bit set, no matter who creates the file in the given directory,
>each file in that directory has the same group owner. This is a great way to
>set up a group shared directory. Once setgid is set, simply make everyone who
>needs access to files in a directory a member of the group and SHAZAM!! access
>is granted.
>
>Here's how you make it happen. Once the target directory is created, simply
>change the permissions.
>
> # chmod g+x, g+s dir_name
>
>There are a couple of caveats. First, the permissions must be set in symbolic
>mode; octal won't work. Second, the execute bit for the group owner must be
>turned on for the setgid permission to work. With setgid properly setup, the
>ls -l output will look like this
>
> rwx r-sr-x
Not quite and there is no reason you cannot use octals. The directory
should be chmod 2775 so it looks like: drwxrwsr-x
This will automatically give all files created there the group of the
directory. However, users that have 022 umask would still need to do a
chmod g+w on files for the group to be able to write to them.
>Note the lowercase 's' in the group owner column. This indicates the setgid
>bit has been properly set. If you forget to ensure the execute permission is
>set, there will be an upper case 'S' in the group owner, indicating an
>undefined state.
>
>
>Andre Quinkertz wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> How can I tell the system to always set the same user of a created file in
>> a specific directory (no matter who creates this file). In the smbd.conf
>> there is an option called 'force user', which is exactly what I'd need. How
>> do I do that if the file is not created via samba, but on the normal linux
>> level ? Can anybody help ?
>>
>> Many thanx in advance,
>>
>> Andre
>>
>> ____________________________________
>> Andre Quinkertz, Dipl.Biol.
>> Institut fuer Entwicklungsbiologie
>> Universitaet zu Koeln
>> Gyrhofstrasse 17
>> 50931 Koeln
>> Germany
>> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> lab phone: +49 221 470-4327
>> lab fax: +49 221 470-5164
>>
>> Support PGP!
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Reed)
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 04:27:28 GMT
In comp.os.linux.setup
Sri Panyam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
:However, at the lilo prompt, when i select "myker" as the image, it prints
:the following and hangs up:
:
:**************
:loading myker.....
:Uncompressing linux ... Ok booting ...
:**************
Did you perhaps compile for an architecture more advanced than you
have, i.e. you have a 486 and you compiled for a PIII? Try
re-compiling with the plain i586 option.
--
Tony Reed
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: Ftp Daemon
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 04:37:07 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001 07:47:30 -0600, Tommy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anyone know how to setup RH 6.1 to not allow anonymous logins?
Remove the anon-ftp package or whatever you did to enable anonymous ftp.
Or userdel ftp (remove the ftp user from your system).
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: HP LaserJet 4 configuration issue
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 04:56:23 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Matt McKnight III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I got an HP LaserJet 4 from a friend of mine, hooked it up, and setup
>the print facility with 'printtool'. Everything works fine, but I can't
>get it to default back to 10cpi. It stays at 18pt. proportional and it
>looks like its only printing the NE quadrant of anything, even the
>PostScript test page from 'printtool'. Anybody got any clues as to what
>I could do with this printer to make it use the default?
Someone else asked the opposite question about an HP 4ML. I think that
one was printing double size (1/4 page filled the page). Setting the
print filter to 300 dpi seemed to solve that. But I wonder if that
printer really is 300 dpi (like my HP 4L which is just smoothed to look
like 600 dpi).
But your print filter may be sending 300 dpi data to a 600 dpi printer.
See if the print filter has a 600 dpi setting.
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: insmod problems . . .
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 05:09:57 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:50:58 -0500, ekk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>Something I've always been confused about - and I'm embarrased to say
>so, because it seems like one of the most fundamental and important
>things about linux - but I have a hard time inserting modules!! For
>instance, I'm trying to install RH, and I made the necessary network
>files for my eth0 card, and I'm trying to do an 'insmod tulip.o', but
>all I get is and '/lib/modules/2.2.12-20/net/tulip.o: init_module:
>Device or resource busy' error. I know I can recompile the kernel with
>tulip turned on and the rest of the network devices turned off, but
>I don't want to - as it takes too long (even on my new dual 850
>machine). What is the appropriate procedure for running this module???
You must be installing an old RH version because that kernel version has a
possible security exploit and should be replaced with 2.2.16 or newer.
If you set up the network scripts, are you sure that it is not loading
automatically during boot (what does lsmod show)? Typically all you need
is something like the following in /etc/conf.modules:
alias eth0 tulip
Then use linuxconf (or netcfg in X) to set up the IP, etc.
However, you may have an irq conflict. My soundcard was using irq 10 and
my nic would not work until I changed the soundcard to something else.
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: LILO in MBR; primary partition for WIndows?
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 05:30:15 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:19:51 GMT, Neal Lippman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am about to partition my HD for a Linux and Win98 dual boot system, and
>would like some thoughts on two questions:
>
>I plan to primarily boot Linux. I will also need to have Win98, primarly for
>a few apps that I need for work related issues. Mostly, I am hoping to be
>able to boot Win98 under VMWare, but am planning to put it in its own
>partition in case I need to boot it without having Linxu under it as well.
>
>My questions:
>
>1. I have seen a lot of posts indicating that in dual-boot configurations,
>one should NOT put lilo into the MBR; however, from information in the lilo
>sources, it seems that lilo in the MBR CAN boot a windows partition as well.
>Is there any reason why I cannot let lilo install to the MBR and use the
>"other" keyword to boot the win98 partition?
The problem was that until recently LILO and the kernel had to be under
cyl 1024 (around 8 GB on a translated drive). I am not sure if the Win98
MBR can boot beyond that, but reinstalling Windows can replace the MBR
which would interfere with booting to Linux. For this reason when
starting fresh with a new drive, I put a 16 MB /boot partition first, then
a primary Windows partition, then the rest of Linux can go anywhere on any
drive (primary or logical).
With LILO on the /boot partition you can switch the active boot partition
between LILO or Windows from Linux or Windows fdisk (or lilo options) and
don't have to worry about Windows overwriting the MBR. But the only
reason you would switch from LILO would be if Windows needs it to be able
to hyberinate, or you wanted to to a totally fresh Linux install.
>2. Does windows98 require itself to be in a primary partition, or will it
>work properly if i install it to a logical partition?
It usually needs to be a primary partition on the first drive, unless you
have a BIOS that can make any drive the boot drive. Some people are under
the impression that Windows has to be the first partition, but that is NOT
true. I actually have 2 /boot partitions under it, but would avoid
putting any extended partitions below it, just to be safe.
Also you can mix Linux and FAT logical partitions in an extended
partition, but the extended partition has to be the proper type (f).
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.de-srv.com/
http://www.autox.chicago.il.us/ http://www.berniesfloral.net/
http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/ http://hammer.prohosting.com/~cgi-wiz/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Aligning Screen in Red Hat 7?
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 05:26:44 GMT
Hi all ...
Well, I finally got Red Hat 7 up and running ... I am typing to
you from there now as a matter of fact ... ran DHCP and I got
onto my broadband provider with no problem.
Here's a question though ...
Is there any tool for aligning the screen?
It is about 20 or so pixels too far to the right vs. the same
resolution in Windows ME.
I checked my monitor and the vertical and horizontal refresh rates
are identical.
Is there any way to adjust this whole display a little to the left or
am I going to have to realign my monitor every time I switch back and
forth between Linux and Windows?
Thanks!
Ax
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
From: "DJM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Config DNS for forward how?
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 22:59:20 -0700
Here's my setup (note: the names have been changed to protect the guilty) --
I have a Linux server running as a firewall/NAT machine (plus some other
services). The machine has two NICs and two IP addresses -- one to the
outside world, 123.45.67.89, and one to the inside world, 192.168.0.1. The
outside address is registered as mydomain.net, with a wildcard CNAME so
that, from the outside world, anything.mydomain.net resolves to
123.45.67.89.
The Linux server also runs a DNS for all computers on the internal network,
so that, internally, I can resolve bart.mydomain.net, lisa.mydomain.net, and
maggie.mydomain.net to 192.168.0.2, 192.168.0.3, and 192.168.0.4,
respectively and specifically.
Now, I've set up a Windows 2000 Server inside the domain, running a domain
of its own. The machine is named burns, and it runs the domain
nuclear.mydomain.net. I set up the Linux box (homer.mydomain.net)'s DNS so
that burns.mydomain.net and nuclear.mydomain.net both resolve to that
machine, 192.168.0.5. burns is also a DNS for the subdomain, so it will
resolve burns.nuclear.mydomain.net back to 192.168.0.5.
Here comes the question.
How do I tell homer to forward DNS lookups for *.nuclear.mydomain.net to
burns? I need to do this because, when I add the Windows 2000 workstation
smithers to the nuclear domain, it will attempt to contact the DNS
burns.nuclear.mydomain.net to resolve both burns.nuclear.mydomain.net and
smithers.nuclear.mydomain.net.
Here's what I've tried:
I've tried having bart, lisa, maggie, and smithers using both machines for
DNS lookups, but no matter which order I try, I end up getting the wrong or
no address for everybody (either homer returns the address for
nuclear.mydomain.net when either smithers.nuclear.* or burns.nuclear.* are
requested, or burns for some reason returns homer's address for anything not
in the nuclear domain). I've tried setting burns up to forward to homer for
DNS lookups and having bart, lisa, maggie, and smithers using only burns,
but (this one's weird) burns returns the EXTERNAL IP address 123.45.67.89
for mydomain.net for anything not in the nuclear subdomain.
What I think would be the way to go is to have homer's DNS set up to forward
to burns for nuclear.* addresses. I don't know if I am setting it up wrong,
or if it's just not possible, but in either case, I am failing to get it to
work. Is it not correct to enter:
zone "nuclear.mydomain.net" {
type forward;
forward only;
forwarders 192.168.0.5;
};
before the:
zone "mydomain.net" {
type master;
file "pz/mydomain.net";
allow-update 192.168.*;
allow-query 192.168.*;
};
in my /etc/named.conf file? What can I do to make this work?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephane)
Subject: Re: Ftp Daemon
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 21:00:37 +0100
Le Fri, 19 Jan 2001 07:47:30 -0600, Tommy A ecrit:
>Anyone know how to setup RH 6.1 to not allow anonymous logins?
>
You can delete the ftp user in /etc/passwd
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Arctic Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Which distro has kernel 2.4, XFree86 4.0.2, & KDE 2.0 ?
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 06:02:34 GMT
Is there a distro out there that comes with kernel 2.4, XFree86 4.0.2, &
KDE 2.0 ?
=====
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.setup.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
