Linux-Setup Digest #518, Volume #20 Sat, 27 Jan 01 21:13:11 EST
Contents:
Re: How to put LILO in 1st sector of boot partition ? (Lee Webb)
Re: ethernet config problem (Edwin Johnson)
intel i810/XF86/debian2.2/cant compile agpgart.o ! (H Edwards)
rpm 4 under Caldera? ("Robert Morelli")
Re: How to put LILO in 1st sector of boot partition ? ("Arctic Storm")
Re: How to put LILO in 1st sector of boot partition ? ("Arctic Storm")
RHlinux7.0 problem with bring up network (Charlie Chen)
Re: Netscape slow ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: rpm 4 under Caldera? (drumvudu)
Help! Killed mouse! (Guy Parry)
Re: Help! Killed mouse! (drumvudu)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Webb)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: How to put LILO in 1st sector of boot partition ?
Date: 27 Jan 2001 23:24:25 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 16:22:04 GMT, Arctic Storm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How to put LILO in 1st sector of boot partition ?
>When I installed RedHat 7, I was given the option to put LILO boot
>record on the MBR (Master Boot Record) or the first sector of the boot
>partition. I chose to put the LILO on the first sector of the boot
>partition. This setup worked great for triple boot with Win2K &
>Win98SE; I gave control to NT Loader.
>How do you do this is Mandrake? Mandrake gives you an option between
>LILO and Grub, but doesn't allow you to specify the location. LILO was
>put in the MBR, and I'm not happy with that.
>If you know how to put LILO in the first sector of the boot partition in
>Mandrake, please share.
>Thanks.
Taken from the Linux/NT HOWTO
(http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Linux+NT-Loader-3.html):
"When you caome to the Lilo-Section, specify your Linux root-partition as your
boot device because the Master Boot Record (MBR) of your harddisk is owned by
Windows NT. This means that the root-entry and the boot-entry in your
/etc/lilo.conf have the same value. If you have a IDE-harddisk and your
partition is the second partition, your boot-entry in /etc/lilo.conf looks
like:
boot=/dev/hda2"
I.E. for installing on first sector, specify the disk with partition number,
rather than just the disk.
Lee.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edwin Johnson)
Subject: Re: ethernet config problem
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 28 Jan 2001 00:02:06 GMT
I have Slackware4.0 running on an office computer in which we have the
LNE100TX which may or may not be the same card you have. The linksys website
stated that a new tulip driver was needed. After compiling the new driver the
card is recognized and works perfectly. In order to compile I had to
download the three other files, as stated on the following url and compile
the pci-scan, then compile the new tulip.c, which is the same url but ends
in tulip.c instead of tulip.html.
At any rate the existing tulip.o module which was in my distribution would
not work with the card. It is probably worth a try. Apparently they changed
one of the chips in the card and had to update the driver.
ftp://ftp.scyld.com/pub/network/tulip.html
Feel free to email me if you want to discuss this further. ...Edwin
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 17:30:26 -0800, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I had a fairly successful installation of turbolinux
>workstation 6.1.(linux kernel-2.2.16). Everything seems
>to be working satisfactory so far, except for the ethernet/DSL
>network card. It is a Linksys fast Ethernet 10/100 model NC100.
>It is mounted on the PCI bus and is supposed to be compatible
>with the tulip.o driver. When reading the documentation for
>the network card it states that it is not possible to set the
>IRQ for the card directly and that you must use the bios or OS
>software to do this at bootup or when the OS takes over.
>
>My pci bus has 4 slots, of which only two are currently being used.
>PCI slot 1 has the ethernet card and PCI slot 3 has the video card.
>The video card is being acknowledged by Linux but not the network card.
>
>I am running a dual boot system with boot magic. On the first part of
>the first hard drive is win95 and on the second part of the first hard
>drive is Linux.
>
>My bios is Award bios XXX with XXX plug and play extension. So far, I
>have
>left everything the same in the bios, where it states the OS is a Pnp OS
>
>and that mapping of the IRQ should be done by the OS. From what I have
>recently read this should work with this version of the kernel.
>
>I think my problem is in one or two areas. Either the tulip.o driver
>in the 2.2.16 kernel does not support this card. Or I am having IRQ
>conflicts?
>I noticed in the /proc/pci that both the USB controller and the ethernet
>
>controller are using IRQ 11?
>
>Any help anyone could offer is very much appreciated, thanks!
>
>David Edelstein
>
>Please email me: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>or respond to this posting, thanks again!
>
>Here is the boot messages: (It's not finding eth0 at all?)
>
>Linux version 2.2.16-3 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
>egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #1 Fri Aug 18 14:51:29
>JST 2000
>relocating initrd image:
> initrd_start:0xc0faf000 initrd_end:0xc0fff9a8
> mem_start:0xc0285000 mem_end:0xc8000000
> initrd_size:0x000509a8 dest:0xc7faf000
>Detected 200457 kHz processor.
>Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
>Calibrating delay loop... 399.77 BogoMIPS
>Memory: 127492k/131072k available (1116k kernel code, 412k reserved,
>1656k data, 72k init, 0k bigmem)
>Dentry hash table entries: 262144 (order 9, 2048k)
>Buffer cache hash table entries: 131072 (order 7, 512k)
>Page cache hash table entries: 32768 (order 5, 128k)
>VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.4.0 initialized
>CPU: Intel Pentium MMX stepping 03
>Checking 386/387 coupling... OK, FPU using exception 16 error reporting.
>
>Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
>Intel Pentium with F0 0F bug - workaround enabled.
>POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
>PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfaff0
>PCI: Using configuration type 1
>PCI: Probing PCI hardware
>Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2
>Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
>NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0.
>NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
>IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
>TCP: Hash tables configured (ehash 131072 bhash 65536)
>IPVS: Connection hash table configured (size=4096, memory=32Kbytes)
>Initializing RT netlink socket
>Starting kswapd v 1.5
>Detected PS/2 Mouse Port.
>Serial driver version 4.27 with MANY_PORTS MULTIPORT SHARE_IRQ enabled
>ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
>ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
>pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured
>apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x07 (Driver version 1.13)
>Real Time Clock Driver v1.09
>RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size
>loop: registered device at major 7
>Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.30
>ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with
>idebus=xx
>PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
>PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> ide0: BM-DMA at 0xf000-0xf007, BIOS settings: hda:pio, hdb:pio
> ide1: BM-DMA at 0xf008-0xf00f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
>hda: WDC AC29100D, ATA DISK drive
>hdb: FUJITSU MPA3026ATU, ATA DISK drive
>hdd: , ATAPI CDROM drive
>ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
>ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
>hda: WDC AC29100D, 8693MB w/1966kB Cache, CHS=1108/255/63
>hdb: FUJITSU MPA3026ATU, 2503MB w/0kB Cache, CHS=5086/16/63
>hdd: ATAPI 17X CD-ROM drive, 120kB Cache
>Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.10
>Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
>FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
>md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MAX_REAL=12
>raid5: measuring checksumming speed
>raid5: MMX detected, trying high-speed MMX checksum routines
> pII_mmx : 295.656 MB/sec
> p5_mmx : 351.282 MB/sec
> 8regs : 213.741 MB/sec
> 32regs : 159.258 MB/sec
>using fastest function: p5_mmx (351.282 MB/sec)
>Loading I2O Core - (c) Copyright 1999 Red Hat Software
>I2O configuration manager v 0.04
>(C) Copyright 1999 Red Hat Software
>scsi : 0 hosts.
>scsi : detected total.
>md.c: sizeof(mdp_super_t) = 4096
>Partition check:
> hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 hda6 >
> hdb: hdb1
>RAMDISK: Compressed image found at block 0
>autodetecting RAID arrays
>autorun ...
>... autorun DONE.
>VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
>autodetecting RAID arrays
>autorun ...
>... autorun DONE.
>VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
>change_root: old root has d_count=1
>Trying to unmount old root ... okay
>Freeing unused kernel memory: 72k freed
>Adding Swap: 1004020k swap-space (priority -1)
>
>When displaying turbonetcfg Select Network Interface:
>
>[ ]eth0: 0.0.0.0
>[*]lo : 127.0.0.1
>
>
>When running turbonetcfg network diagnosis
>
>FQDN of This System: localhost
>Physical Interfaces Available: Failed: eth0
>Gateway Device : (none)
>Gateway Device Available : N/A
>Gateway Device Active : N/A
>Default Route Activated : Yes
>Gateway is Reachable : No
>Primary DNS is Reachable : N/A
>Secondary DNS is Reachable : N/A
>Tertiary DNS is Reachable : N/A
>Hostname Lookup Works : No
>
>/etc/modules.conf file looks like this
>
>keep
>path[usb]=/lib/modules/'uname -r'
>path[extra]=/lib/modules/'uname -r'
>path[pcmcia]=/lib/modules/'uname -r'
>alias net-pf-5 appletalk
>alias eth0 tulip.o
># This file is created by PCI device probing routine.
># You might need to add another alias or options.
>
>/proc/ioports
>
>0000-001f : dma1
>0020-003f : pic1
>0040-005f : timer
>0060-006f : keyboard
>0070-007f : rtc
>0080-008f : dma page reg
>00a0-00bf : pic2
>00c0-00df : dma2
>00f0-00ff : fpu
>0170-0177 : ide1
>01f0-01f7 : ide0
>02f8-02ff : serial(auto)
>0376-0376 : ide1
>03c0-03df : vga+
>03f6-03f6 : ide0
>03f8-03ff : serial(auto)
>f000-f007 : ide0
>f008-f00f : ide1
>
>/proc/pci looks like this
>
>PCI devices found:
> Bus 0, device 0, function 0:
> Host bridge: Integ 82439TX (rev 1).
> Medium devsel. Master Capable. Latency=32.
>Bus 0, device 7, function 0:
> ISA bridge: Intel 82371AB PIIX4 ISA (rev1).
> Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capbale. Master Capable. No bursts.
>
>Bus ), device 7, function 1:
> IDE interface: Intel 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 1).
> Medium devsel. Fast back-toback capable. Master Capable. Latency=32.
>
> I/O at 0xf000 [0xf001].
>Bus 0, device 7, function 2:
> USB Controller: Intel 82371AB PIIX4 USB (rev 1).
> Medium devsel. Fast back-toback capable. IRQ 11. Master Capable.
>Latency=32.
> I/O at 0x6400 [0x6401].
>Bus 0, device 7, function 3:
> Bridge: Intel 82371AB PIIX$ ACPI (rev 1).
> Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable.
>Bus 0, device 9, function 0:
> VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. ViRGE (rev 6).
> Medium devsel. IRQ 10. Master Capable. Latency=32. Min Gnt=4.Max
>Lat=255.
> Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe0000000 [0xe0000000].
>Bus 0, device 11, function 0:
> Ethernet controller: Unknown vendor Unknown device (rev 17).
> Vendor id=1317. Device id=985.
> Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. IRQ 11. Master Capable.
>Latency=32. Min Gnt=255.Max Lat=255.
> I/O at 0x6500 [0x6501].
> Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe40000000 [0xe40000000].
>
>/proc/interrupts looks like this
>
> CPU0
> 0: 225847 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 6868 XT-PIC keyboard
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 4: 23845 XT-PIC serial
> 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc
> 13: 1 XT-PIC fpu
> 14: 158158 XT-PIC ide0
> 15: 6 XT-PIC ide1
>NMI: 0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ Edwin Johnson ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
~ http://www.shreve.net/~elj ~
~ ~
~ "Once you have flown, you will walk the ~
~ earth with your eyes turned skyward, ~
~ for there you have been, there you long ~
~ to return." -- da Vinci ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
------------------------------
From: H Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: intel i810/XF86/debian2.2/cant compile agpgart.o !
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 19:01:53 -0500
Howdy,
im trying to get xf86 (in debian linux 2.2.12) to work with my intel
i810 chipset ..i've read
tons of documentation etc..but im now stuck, but i know im Very close to
solution!!..heres what i've done so far,
i've gotten the file i810gtt-0.2-41.rpm from the intel site,
and placed it in a directory at /temp_i810 then (as root) did the
following command:
alien i810gtt-0.2-41.rpm
this unpacked the file i810gtt_0.2-5_i386.deb
next i did this:
dpkg --install i810gtt_0.2-5_i386.deb
which creates these 2 files at /
I810Gtt-0.2.tar.gz and I810Gtt-0.2.spec
these 2 files i then moved into my temp_i810 directory
then i performed this command:
tar -zxvf I810Gtt-0.2.tar.gz
which created5 files and 1 directory(which contains 2 files):
README agpgart.c agpgart.h
testgart.c Makefile /linux/ modversions.h autoconf.h
Now for the Problem:
i understand that i should be able to produce the kernel module
agpgart.o
by simply typing "make" in the directory in which the above files
reside...
when i do i get the following messages on screen:
gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -m486 -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -DCONFIG_PCI
-I.
-I/usr/src/linux/include -pipe -fno-strength-reduce -malign-loops=2
-malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2 -DCONFIG_MODVERSIONS -DCONFIG_MTRR
-DCONFIG_1GB -c -o agpgart.o agpgart.c
.( here a Huge quantity of errors fly by which i cant seem to capture
and read..)
make: *** [agpgart.o] error 1
..and of course, no agpgart.o is produced...
any Clues?
Thank You a TON for your help!
Hugh
------------------------------
From: "Robert Morelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera
Subject: rpm 4 under Caldera?
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 15:47:41 -0600
I am running Caldera eDesktop version 2.4. The version of rpm
in Caldera is 3.03, while the current version of rpm seems to be
4.04. I've run into quite a few packages that seem to require
version 4 and it's becoming a nuissance. However, I'm very
puzzled.
First, I could find no mention of rpm version 4 on Caldera's site.
Second, the home site of rpm at www.rpm.org has no recent
documentation. Every document there is years old.
I've never seen a feature of an operating system as important
as rpm go undocumented this way and I really don't know what
to make of it. Some obvious questions:
Is there a source of information on rpm 4 that I've missed?
Is this sort of lack of documentation just a ``normal'' part of the
Linux culture?
Is rpm 4 still experimental?
Are there known serious problems with it?
Should I avoid rpm 4 until documentation appears?
Any advice appreciated.
------------------------------
From: "Arctic Storm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: How to put LILO in 1st sector of boot partition ?
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 01:31:11 GMT
> >How to put LILO in 1st sector of boot partition ?
> >When I installed RedHat 7, I was given the option to put LILO boot
> >record on the MBR (Master Boot Record) or the first sector of the boot
> >partition. I chose to put the LILO on the first sector of the boot
> >partition. This setup worked great for triple boot with Win2K &
> >Win98SE; I gave control to NT Loader.
> >How do you do this is Mandrake? Mandrake gives you an option between
> >LILO and Grub, but doesn't allow you to specify the location. LILO was
> >put in the MBR, and I'm not happy with that.
> >If you know how to put LILO in the first sector of the boot partition in
> >Mandrake, please share.
> >Thanks.
>
> Taken from the Linux/NT HOWTO
> (http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/mini/Linux+NT-Loader-3.html):
>
> "When you caome to the Lilo-Section, specify your Linux root-partition as
your
> boot device because the Master Boot Record (MBR) of your harddisk is owned
by
> Windows NT. This means that the root-entry and the boot-entry in your
> /etc/lilo.conf have the same value. If you have a IDE-harddisk and your
> partition is the second partition, your boot-entry in /etc/lilo.conf
looks
> like:
>
> boot=/dev/hda2"
>
> I.E. for installing on first sector, specify the disk with partition
number,
> rather than just the disk.
When you install Mandrake, the option to specify the location is never
presented.
------------------------------
From: "Arctic Storm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: How to put LILO in 1st sector of boot partition ?
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 01:34:41 GMT
> > How to put LILO in 1st sector of boot partition ?
>
> Edit the file /etc/lilo.conf, change the line boot=/dev/hda to point
> to your boot partition (/dev/hda0, or whatever), then run /sbin/lilo
You seem to have misunderstood my question.
The LILO boot record is placed on the MBR by Mandrake.
MBR originally had info regarding Win2K boot, but now, it has LILO boot
record.
Your proposal does not correct the problem.
------------------------------
From: Charlie Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RHlinux7.0 problem with bring up network
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:33:24 +0900
hi
I'm trying to change my pc connection from a 100BaseT subnet to a
10BaseT subnet. With the previous 100BaseT subnet, everything works
fine. With the new subnet, windows2000 which i installed on same machine
works fine. but under linux, i failed to connect to network. I modified
IP address, gateway etc to 10BaseT subnet's ones using linuxconf and
confirmed the modification with netcfg and ifconfig -a.
one thing i noticed is when i reboot the machine, i got message "eth0,
media is 100mb/s"(which suppose to be 10mb/s) and "eth0, media is not
connected, link down or incompatible connection"
what did i miss?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Netscape slow
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 01:42:49 GMT
I thought it might be dns also, but I have
an always on cable modem.
I should do a nslookup fast.
Sadly, still netscape takes 5 minutes to show
the first page.
"Kurt R. Rahlfs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I give up.
> > Netscape takes forever (5 minutes) to show the
> > first web page after I boot the machine,
> > even if it it has an ip address on my local
> > network for the webpage to display.
> > This makes me think it is not a DNS problem and
> > its on the same network (actually apache
> > server on the same machine). After the first
> > web page, all web pages are fast.
> > Any clues??
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com
> > http://www.deja.com/
>
> I've had this happen to me when my dsl connection has gone down. It
> didn't matter that I was accessing a local page. Try connecting and
see
> if getting that local page doesn't speed up. If that is the problem
I'm
> sorry I don't have another solution.
>
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera
From: drumvudu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: rpm 4 under Caldera?
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 01:53:41 GMT
Robert, you can get rpm v4 from rpmfind.com. I will tell you that there
are issues involved in upgrading directly to v4 from your current version.
v4 will break certain packages and you will end up back at your
version. Your best bet is to get the current version of v3. It has support
built in to load packages that need version 4 and is way more stable.You
can get it at rpmfind.com also. Once you install it <man rpm> for the
docs..
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Robert Morelli was alledged to have proclaimed:
> I am running Caldera eDesktop version 2.4. The version of rpm
> in Caldera is 3.03, while the current version of rpm seems to be
> 4.04. I've run into quite a few packages that seem to require
> version 4 and it's becoming a nuissance. However, I'm very
> puzzled.
>
> First, I could find no mention of rpm version 4 on Caldera's site.
>
> Second, the home site of rpm at www.rpm.org has no recent
> documentation. Every document there is years old.
>
> I've never seen a feature of an operating system as important
> as rpm go undocumented this way and I really don't know what
> to make of it. Some obvious questions:
>
> Is there a source of information on rpm 4 that I've missed?
> Is this sort of lack of documentation just a ``normal'' part of the
> Linux culture?
> Is rpm 4 still experimental?
> Are there known serious problems with it?
> Should I avoid rpm 4 until documentation appears?
>
> Any advice appreciated.
>
"Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense and
plain dealing"...Ralph Waldo Emerson
"It takes a wonderful brain and exquisite senses to produce a few
stupid ideas"...George Santayana
Confucious say "If you play in root,
eventually you will kill tree"...anonymous
SuSE 7.0 2.2.16
Linux: t h e c h o i c e o f a
G N U g e n e r a t i o n . . .
------------------------------
From: Guy Parry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help! Killed mouse!
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 12:52:22 +1100
I have been irritated by not having gpm running my mouse
properly, and I was playing around with its settings the other day.
When I booted this morning I got kudzu telling me that my Serial mouse
had been removed, or something like that, and I accidentally hit
"Remove Configuration" instead of 'Do Nothing". Now I have no mouse!
Running 'mouseconfig' does nothing. I've checked my hwconf file and
there's nothing to do with a mouse in there. How on Earth do I get it
going again? I'm running Mdk 7.2, the mouse is a MS IntelliMouse 1.1A
Serial Compatible.
Thanks!
------------------------------
From: drumvudu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help! Killed mouse!
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 02:04:14 GMT
Guy, can't you either run harddrake or xf86config or XF86Setup?
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Guy Parry was alledged to have proclaimed:
> I have been irritated by not having gpm running my mouse
> properly, and I was playing around with its settings the other day.
> When I booted this morning I got kudzu telling me that my Serial mouse
> had been removed, or something like that, and I accidentally hit
> "Remove Configuration" instead of 'Do Nothing". Now I have no mouse!
> Running 'mouseconfig' does nothing. I've checked my hwconf file and
> there's nothing to do with a mouse in there. How on Earth do I get it
> going again? I'm running Mdk 7.2, the mouse is a MS IntelliMouse 1.1A
> Serial Compatible.
> Thanks!
>
"Nothing astonishes men so much as common sense and
plain dealing"...Ralph Waldo Emerson
"It takes a wonderful brain and exquisite senses to produce a few
stupid ideas"...George Santayana
Confucious say "If you play in root,
eventually you will kill tree"...anonymous
SuSE 7.0 2.2.16
Linux: t h e c h o i c e o f a
G N U g e n e r a t i o n . . .
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.setup.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
