Linux-Setup Digest #443, Volume #21 Thu, 14 Jun 01 22:13:11 EDT
Contents:
Re: Can't Boot Machine! (Rand Simberg)
Red Hat 3D Acceleration (Chris)
chmod +s pump security risk? (Jeevan Patil)
Re: Netscape's network connection was refused by the server (Michael McCord)
Re: Can't Boot Machine! (Rand Simberg)
Re: Buying a CDR/RW (Julian Bordas)
Re: Hard drive performance w/ hdparm (Michael Perry)
Re: Problems installing matrox card ("Stuart Smith")
Re: "Stable" 2.4.X Linux Kernels ("Stuart Smith")
Re: New H/W, Disk Tuning and risks of corruption from tweaking with hdparm (Michael
Perry)
Re: Buying a CDR/RW (Stanislaw Flatto)
Re: Can I LINUX on this PC? (Stanislaw Flatto)
Re: Apache Dir Browsing (Pantek Technical Support)
Mandrake 8.0 keeps freezing and rpmDrake problem, please help! (Yu Di)
New files date is UTC hours ahead of RTC and system time (William Paul Vrotney)
2.4.2 Kernel Compiling Problem (Skylar Thompson)
Re: Mandrake 8.0 keeps freezing and rpmDrake problem, please help! ("SykkN")
Re: Red Hat 3D Acceleration (Craig Kelley)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rand Simberg)
Subject: Re: Can't Boot Machine!
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:10:30 GMT
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:44:07 GMT, in a place far, far away,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rand Simberg) made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:18:40 +0100, in a place far, far away, Robert
>Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> made the phosphor on my
>monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>
>>>> I copied the bzImage to /boot, added it to lilo, keeping the original
>>>> one.
>>
>>And /boot/System.map?
>>
>>You should allways make new entries for experimental kernels, and only
>>replace your default kernel, once you are really sure it is solid.
>
>OK, I reverted to the old System.map, and made 2.2.19 the default
>again, and I seem to be back where I was before the kernel rebuild.
I spoke too soon. After I did this, it did boot into 2.2.19, but I
couldn't get RP pppoe to run properly (i.e., it would connect, and
show up as a ppp0 connection in ifconfig, but I couldn't ping
anything, even with firewall disabled).
When I tried rebooting it, it wouldn't do it again. I went back in
with the floppy, and reran lilo, but no joy. I still cannot boot into
any of the images on my hard drive.
Any suggestions now?
--
simberg.interglobal.org * 310 372-7963 (CA) 307 739-1296 (Jackson Hole)
interglobal space lines * 307 733-1715 (Fax) http://www.interglobal.org
"Extraordinary launch vehicles require extraordinary markets..."
Replace first . with @ and throw out the "@trash." to email me.
Here's my email address for autospammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Red Hat 3D Acceleration
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:30:05 -0000
I currently use Red Hat 7.0, but I heard Red Hat 7.1 finally supports 3D
acceleration ... as the reviews say, at least. Does anybody have
experience with RH 7.1 to confirm that it can use 3D accelerators
(specifically, an ATI Radeon), AND also, most importantly, does it support
OpenGL for hardware accelerated games such as Unreal Tournament from Loki
Games? Thank you so much. I'm really hoping that upgrading to RH 7.1 will
not only add Radeon support, but add OpenGL support so I can finally play
Unreal Tournament! Thanks guys! :-)
--
Posted via CNET Help.com
http://www.help.com/
------------------------------
From: Jeevan Patil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: chmod +s pump security risk?
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:32:35 -0700
Hello,
If I do
chmod 4755 /sbin/pump on a shared Linux machine is that a security risk
?
Please advise.
Regards,
Jeevan.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael McCord)
Subject: Re: Netscape's network connection was refused by the server
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:41:12 -0400
Bob Bourne wrote:
>
> Three examples:
> Netscape's network connection was refused by the server
> home.netscape.com
> etc.
> Netscape's network connection was refused by the server
> www.debian.org
> etc.
> Netscape's network connection was refused by the server
> packages.debian.org
> etc.
> She's asking for Configuration location (URL)
> and SOCKS Host:
> Lynx connects and downloads, OK.
> [Communicator 4.77]
> [dist: debian 2.2 R3 i386, 3cdrom set]
> [$ export http_proxy="http://proxy.sale.vic.australis.com.au:80/"; - has been
> set.]
> Any ideas greatly appreciated.
> PM - replies to me fine.
> Bob Bourne.
Tried Today? Their server's been down.
m
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rand Simberg)
Subject: Re: Can't Boot Machine!
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:50:26 GMT
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:10:30 GMT, in a place far, far away,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rand Simberg) made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
>>OK, I reverted to the old System.map, and made 2.2.19 the default
>>again, and I seem to be back where I was before the kernel rebuild.
>
>I spoke too soon. After I did this, it did boot into 2.2.19, but I
>couldn't get RP pppoe to run properly (i.e., it would connect, and
>show up as a ppp0 connection in ifconfig, but I couldn't ping
>anything, even with firewall disabled).
>
>When I tried rebooting it, it wouldn't do it again. I went back in
>with the floppy, and reran lilo, but no joy. I still cannot boot into
>any of the images on my hard drive.
>
>Any suggestions now?
Now it's working again, though I still can't boot from 2.4.5.
<shrug>
BTW, how do I get it to not overwrite resolv.conf when it runs
adsl-start?
--
simberg.interglobal.org * 310 372-7963 (CA) 307 739-1296 (Jackson Hole)
interglobal space lines * 307 733-1715 (Fax) http://www.interglobal.org
"Extraordinary launch vehicles require extraordinary markets..."
Replace first . with @ and throw out the "@trash." to email me.
Here's my email address for autospammers: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Julian Bordas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Buying a CDR/RW
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:04:46 +1000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stanislaw Flatto wrote:
> Just a comment:
> You want them to perform fast, then get SCSI.
> BTW who are the manufacturers of those units, not distributors?
I'm in a situation where money is more of a factor than speed. :-(
I have the time but not lots of $'s
Julian
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Perry)
Subject: Re: Hard drive performance w/ hdparm
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 00:12:54 -0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:33:05 +0100,
Robert Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike W. wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the great information, Mike P., Rob, and others!
>>
>> Where can I find the current black list? I'm using RH7.1, which
>> I think means I'm using kernel 2.4.2 or thereabouts, so I'm almost
>> up-to-date kernel-wise.
>
> Try downloading the latest -ac series kernels, the change log lists some
> Via patches, from the new IDE Via chipset maintainer.
>
> Perhaps it helps.
>
> Rob
As a case in point, the 2.4.5 kernel contains patches for the VIA chipset
which work very well here. As pointed out earlier, with this included, one
does not need hdparm whatsoever on a 2.4 kernel. I still backup my systems
but I believe that the 2.4.5 kernel provides some manageable fixes for the
VIA issues overall.
Check out the first few lines of the driver file as it mentions in the help
item for the VIA drivers.
--
Michael Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====================
------------------------------
From: "Stuart Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problems installing matrox card
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:20:09 +1000
Please note that Matrox now has a lInux driver and version of Powerdesk
available to download on their website.
Haven't installed them yet, only found them a little while ago.
Stuart
"mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:xEFV6.3902$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Everything seems to work ok up to the point where I install the video
card.
> I have a Matrox Millenium G400 32M video card. After selecting this I try
to
> test it and the screen goes black. I even try different modes and
> resolutions and even video cards to no avail. What am I doing wrong?
>
> System makeup.
> 384M sdram
> 20G seagate HD + 4G seagate HD
> Soundblaster pro (ISA)
> Acer 76c Monitor
> Matrox Millenium G400 32M
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Stuart Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: "Stable" 2.4.X Linux Kernels
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:16:27 +1000
As a quick note try the Matrox site they have released LINUX DRIVERS!!!!!!!
For G200 onwards from memory. With a version of Power Desk for Linux too!!!!
To be honest I haven't installed them yet so can't say how well they work,
will know better this afternoon.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ome.com...
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:29:25 -0700 (PDT), patrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I just updated my Linux kernel from 2.2.16-22 to 2.2.18 and
> >life is good. (I was having a problem with the 2.2.16-22 kernel.)
> >
> >However, there are now 2.4.0-2.4.5 kernels. Are there any
> >2.4.X kernels which are known to be better than others?
> >
> >Please advise.
>
> I'd say to go with the latest'n'greatest version. I currently run 2.4.4
and
> it works like a champ with one exception: it's matrox mga driver is out
of date
> and I had to go to xfree.org's cvs site to get a usable driver.
>
> The 2.4.x kernel is the most reliable software I've ever experienced in my
25
> years of computing.
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Perry)
Subject: Re: New H/W, Disk Tuning and risks of corruption from tweaking with hdparm
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 00:18:32 -0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:49:11 +0100, Robert Davies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Posting this as there's a lot of posts on new hardware, DMA and hdparm in
> various groups. As the kernel is putting all Via chipsets on the
> blacklist, due to varous corruption reports, lots of folk will need to find
> out about this, many have been advocated 'hdparm -d1 -X...' for performance
> turning.
>
> The risk of corruption is real! With the latest versions of 2.2 and 2.4,
> the IDE driver sets the IDE system to the optimal settings, if it doesn't
> enable UDMA, it is probably because your chipset is on a blacklist. There
> are some disks on blacklists for particular modes too ie. UDMA mode3 may be
> set, rather than mode4 (ATA66).
>
> Useful article for anyone with Via KT133A chipset
>
> http://www.au-ja.de/review-kt133a-1-en.html
>
> Those thinking of making a purchase should find this article interesting.
>
> http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/06/1821202&mode=thread
>
> A search of an LKML archive http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s3-4 for Via and
> corruption may prove enlightening.
>
> Keep your data safe, and make backups, read only is obviously safer than
> write, but there is homework to do. There should be no need to tweak with
> hdparm these days.
>
> Rob
Also one could not go very wrong by looking at the VIa ide drivers contained
in the 2.4.5 kernel. The driver file mentions the versions of the VIA
chipset/southbridge that the driver now works with. I have been running
this driver on my systems with the KT133 southbridge stuff for awhile now
and have had quite good results.
>From sources I have read the VIA driver is evolving and support for several
of the chipsets was enhanced in the release that is in the 2.4.5 kernel.
One can definitely read a lot of posts on the kernel list and in different
places. A few things I have learned are that hdparm is not necessary in
tuning or running a system with the VIA chipset supported by the VIA
drivers. They take care of setting UDMA and also tell you how to change it.
The information at the top of the driver file is quite interesting.
I do think that one drive I have, a Western Digital 30g drive has some
problems and I noted early on several drives which were definitely not
recommended. I have twin Maxtor drives which work well and I ordered some
IBM drives to replace the WD.
All in all, the advice above is sage, and doing further research allows one
to find the issues and take the appropriate corrective action. Note that
the VIA driver has been modified and updated to include new VIA chipsets
with the 2.4.5 kernel release.
--
Michael Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====================
------------------------------
From: Stanislaw Flatto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Buying a CDR/RW
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:43:44 +1000
Julian Bordas wrote:
> Stanislaw Flatto wrote:
>
> > Just a comment:
> > You want them to perform fast, then get SCSI.
> > BTW who are the manufacturers of those units, not distributors?
>
> I'm in a situation where money is more of a factor than speed. :-(
> I have the time but not lots of $'s
So get SCSI 8x2x2 and you won't regret it.
Just my opinion.
NB writing from hard disk to CD writer on the same IDE interface creates
traffic jams, caveat emptor!
Stanislaw.
>
>
> Julian
------------------------------
From: Stanislaw Flatto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can I LINUX on this PC?
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:02:06 +1000
Welcome to Linux-land!
I read the other postings and here are my 2c.
Hardware - no problem.
Booting diskettes, if needed, go in Windows to DOS prompt and format diskettes
noting that there are NO bad tracks on them. Formatting in Windows spells
trouble later.
Distribution, as you are unfamiliar with any of them, you will have to learn.
So invest the time and go Debian, it will drive you crazy (coming from
MS-Glassware) for some time, but in the end it is worth it.
And get some reference book on Unix/Linux system administration, something that
you think only gurus use, in no time you will be reading it freely.
Have fun.
Stanislaw.
Slack user from Ulladulla.
Guz wrote:
> Hi there:
> I have a self built PC with:
>
> 815E chipset on CUSL2 MoBoard
> BIOS 1003
> PIII 800EB -133
> 512SDRAM memory 133.(non ecc).
> Sound Card is SB Live! Platinum.
> OS W98SE
>
> And I have the 3 CDs packet from Debian-Linux.
>
> Can I install this OS on this PC? ...
> In the file "boot.bat" It says that
> " CPU is in V86-Mode (May be WINDOWS, EMM386, QEMM, 386MAX,...) You need
> pure 386/486 real mode or a VCPI server to boot Linux..."
>
> One more question:
> I can't boot from my CD-ROM Drive, How can I make a bootable Floppy Disc in
> order to have acces to my CD and install all the rest?
>
> Any comments?... Thanks in advance.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:31:58 -0400
From: Pantek Technical Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Apache Dir Browsing
> I want to be able to turn off directory browsing so people can't see the
> contents of a directory that has files stored in it. Is there a way to do
> this. I looked through httpd.conf but don't find reference to this.
> Tommy Martin
Tommy,
In Apache 1.3.14, you can disable directory browsing on a specific
directory by adding a <Directory "/dir"> entry in httpd.conf that does
not contain the control setting "Indexes".
Users will not be able to see the contents of the directory unless there
is a valid index file, such as index.html or index.htm. If there is an
index file and you want to still hide the directory, change the
permissions of the file so that they cannot be read by the apache user.
Example httpd.conf configuration.
<Directory "/home/richard/public_html/test/">
Options Includes
AllowOverride All
</Directory>
Files in test are not browseable, however if the user knows the exact name
of a file in the directory, they will be able to read it unless it has
permissions set to not allow the apache user to read.
Hope this helps.
Richard Zack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RHCE
--
Commercial Linux Support and Security Center 24/7
=========================================================
Business class Linux Support and Security Services are
available 24/7 on http://linux.pantek.com or by calling
1-877-LINUX-FIX. Order support online and start
talking to a certified technician within thirty minutes!
=========================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yu Di)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Mandrake 8.0 keeps freezing and rpmDrake problem, please help!
Date: 14 Jun 2001 18:07:13 -0700
Hi, I have installed Mandrake 8.0 on my machine (PII350, 288M memory).
And ever since I began to install, I have been encountering innumerous
system freezes, and I could hardly use rpmDrake to install anything.
It took me about 12-15 attempts before I actually installed the
system. In other attempts, either the installation halts during the
copying of package, or the system freezes when I tried to log in.
After I finally got it installed, I tried to install some packages. I
copied the packages on my zip disk, and started rpmDrake, tried to add
a source (selected options: "removable", "zip", "/mnt/zip"). After I
clicked "ok" on the "define sources" dialog, it parsed the sources,
and didn't find any RPM on my zip disk! And, when I started the define
source dialog again, it does not have the zip disk source in it!
Then I copied the RPM's to my local disk, and tried to define a
"local" source. I clicked on "ok" again, and the rpmDrake freezed! I
tried to log out of X and come in again, but the system freezed right
away!
I cold booted the system, re-tried to open rpmDrake, and the system at
once freezed again!
Finally I re-booted and tried to install some packages from the
CD-ROMs. But for most of the packages (1 or 2 worked), the system
tries to open rpminst, and soon after it says that "an installation
has occurred" or "software already installed", although I am pretty
sure that none of them has been installed.
So what is the problem over here? I am about to give up and try
another distribution (I do not dare to re-install with the CDs
anymore, as I don't know how many attempts it will take me this time
to get it successfully installed).
Any suggestion is welcome, thanks!
------------------------------
Subject: New files date is UTC hours ahead of RTC and system time
From: William Paul Vrotney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:48:06 GMT
This is a RH 6.0 system with dual boot to Win98.
I have the problem that both system time (date) and RTC (hwclock) are
correct and both print the same times. But when a new file is created it's
creation time is 7 hours ahead of these (this would be exactly UTC since I
am in California where UTC is is 7 hours ahead). For example:
# date
Wed Jun 13 04:49:53 PDT 2001
# /sbin/hwclock --test
Wed Jun 13 04:50:07 2001 -0.762426 seconds
# touch temp
ls -l
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 bv bv 0 Jun 13 11:50 temp
So file temp's time 11:50 is 7 hours ahead of date's time 4:50. My
/etc/sysconfig/clock file is
UTC=false
ARC=false
Rarely do I boot to the Win98 partition but I needed to the other day and
then when I rebooted to Linux I started noticing this problem. When I
booted to the Win98 partition it popped up that the clock did not adjust for
daylight savings time and asked me if I wanted to have the clock adjusted.
So I accepted the clock adjust. Now, I don't know if this is what caused
the problem I am having. It is my understanding is that the only thing that
Win98 could do is set the RTC and nothing else should carry over to the
Linux partition. However, I just added this fact in case it has anything to
do with the problem.
I checked some of the Linux clock sites and nowhere could I find a remedy
for this symptom. So, does anyone have any idea what is happening here
and/or how to fix it?
Thanks.
--
William P. Vrotney - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Skylar Thompson)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: 2.4.2 Kernel Compiling Problem
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:54:24 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am having some trouble compiling the 2.4.2 kernel. Whenever I try to compile it
(make dep;make clean; etc.), it displays: .hdepend:1493 Unterminated variable
reference.
I have tried getting the source again from the CD, to no avail. Is there any way to
fix this
problem, or do I have to go back to the 2.2.18 kernel?
-- Skylar Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
`All that is gold does not glitter/Not all who wander are lost
The old that is strong does not wither/Deep roots are not reached by the frost
>From the ashes a fire shall be woken/A light from the shadows shall spring
Renewed shall be blade that was broken/The crownless again shall be king.'
------------------------------
From: "SykkN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.mandrake
Subject: Re: Mandrake 8.0 keeps freezing and rpmDrake problem, please help!
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:05:23 -0500
I tried to install Mandrake 8.0 three times. Everytime, I was able to log
in, and get the KDE desktop, but it was ugly. Drop down menus were leaving
pixel trails on the open windows. The distro was not even installed 30
minutes before it was totally screwed up. It locked up once and I had to
turn the power off. I turned the power on and it booted ok, and checked the
filesystem and was able to boot. Again it locked up and I had to do the
same, but this time it found major errors in the filesystem and wouldn't
finish booting and said I needed to start fdisk and fix the errors manually.
Thinking this must have been some fluke, I busted out the CD's once again
and did another clean install. Within 20 minutes of the completed
installation I was getting out the trusty Mandrake 7.2 CD's. I have had no
problems with 7.2 other than mounting my USB Zip drive, and that has to do a
little with my inexperience in mounting and umounting filesystems. Maybe
KDE is the bad guy here and not the distro. I am going to try installing
the system without KDE and see if that helps at all.
--
SykkN
talk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
visit: http://www.lessthan.org
"Yu Di" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi, I have installed Mandrake 8.0 on my machine (PII350, 288M memory).
> And ever since I began to install, I have been encountering innumerous
> system freezes, and I could hardly use rpmDrake to install anything.
>
> It took me about 12-15 attempts before I actually installed the
> system. In other attempts, either the installation halts during the
> copying of package, or the system freezes when I tried to log in.
>
> After I finally got it installed, I tried to install some packages. I
> copied the packages on my zip disk, and started rpmDrake, tried to add
> a source (selected options: "removable", "zip", "/mnt/zip"). After I
> clicked "ok" on the "define sources" dialog, it parsed the sources,
> and didn't find any RPM on my zip disk! And, when I started the define
> source dialog again, it does not have the zip disk source in it!
>
> Then I copied the RPM's to my local disk, and tried to define a
> "local" source. I clicked on "ok" again, and the rpmDrake freezed! I
> tried to log out of X and come in again, but the system freezed right
> away!
>
> I cold booted the system, re-tried to open rpmDrake, and the system at
> once freezed again!
>
> Finally I re-booted and tried to install some packages from the
> CD-ROMs. But for most of the packages (1 or 2 worked), the system
> tries to open rpminst, and soon after it says that "an installation
> has occurred" or "software already installed", although I am pretty
> sure that none of them has been installed.
>
> So what is the problem over here? I am about to give up and try
> another distribution (I do not dare to re-install with the CDs
> anymore, as I don't know how many attempts it will take me this time
> to get it successfully installed).
>
> Any suggestion is welcome, thanks!
------------------------------
From: Craig Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Red Hat 3D Acceleration
Date: 14 Jun 2001 20:08:52 -0600
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I currently use Red Hat 7.0, but I heard Red Hat 7.1 finally supports 3D
> acceleration ... as the reviews say, at least. Does anybody have
> experience with RH 7.1 to confirm that it can use 3D accelerators
> (specifically, an ATI Radeon), AND also, most importantly, does it support
> OpenGL for hardware accelerated games such as Unreal Tournament from Loki
> Games? Thank you so much. I'm really hoping that upgrading to RH 7.1 will
> not only add Radeon support, but add OpenGL support so I can finally play
> Unreal Tournament! Thanks guys! :-)
RedHat 7.1 does not include DRI support for the Radeon; you need to
install XFree86 4.1 on top of it for that to work. I'd expect RedHat
to release packages for it RSN.
--
It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard
Craig Kelley -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP block
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list by posting to comp.os.linux.setup.
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Setup Digest
******************************
