At 11:17 AM 1/14/99 +0100, Herbert Wengatz 42850 wrote:
>Chris Pirih wrote:
>+> At 10:24 AM 01/13/1999 -0500, Robert G. Brown wrote:
>+> >On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Robert M. Hyatt wrote:
>+> >> On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Robert G. Brown wrote:
>+> >> > day uptimes under full load are a rather routine occurence. NT, on the
>+> >> > other hand...
>+> >>
>+> >> goes down more often than Monica Lewinsky.
>+> >>
>+> >> Sorry Alan, but you make a good straight-man. I simply couldn't
>+> >> resist, having several dozen NT boxes here. Our average Linux box
>+> >> is up 100 times longer than our average NT box, 'on average'. :)
>+> >
>+> >Gee, that would be what, once a day? Say it ain't so! And I just
>+> >dropped a gazillion dollars on NT Server for my mission critical SMP
>+> >server...N(o)T!
>+>
>+> Hey, I use NT on my desktop, and it stays up for *days* at a time
>+> between crashes, sometimes even a *week* or two! In fact, i
>
>I guess you are running as sole application the screensaver, don't you ? ;-)
>
>Herbert
Actually, I hate to admit it, but my 95 machine stayed up for 16 days while
I was on Holidays serving ftp(which I have about 200 meg a day ave) and
checking my email(which I had 1700 and a bit over the time period). _And_,
after I got back from holidays, I used the machine for a couple of days to
see what would happen. The machine was not as fast as I was used to, but
it was usable. I eventually rebooted for sake of convienece. Sorry to
have to bring this up:(
--Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
