> > I also thought becker mentioned that the supplied driver was not > done well. Is the current driver any better? Assuming that both It works for me. I got between 3MB/sec to 6MB/sec for ftp using 100Mb/s hub in half-duplex mode with Lite-On 82c168 PNIC, depending on the machines of client/server. > incarnations of the card are functional, is there a reason to > prefer the true tulip rather than the clone? > I don't know. But it is getting harder to find the true tulip card. -- H.J. Lu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/ To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Netlink Support
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? H.J. Lu
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Chris Mauritz
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? H.J. Lu
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Chris Mauritz
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? H.J. Lu
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Douglas Eadline
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Jon Lewis
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Alan Cox
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Jon Lewis
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Eric Swanson
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Mark Hahn
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Dave Cinege
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Mark S. Lewis
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? H.J. Lu
- Re: Which 100Mb ethernet NIC? Douglas Eadline
