On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Dave Cinege wrote:
> No that is not the goal. The goal is a very much overclocked but 100%
> stable system, of which I obtained in my last machine. It will take some
> work. I will get it, just give me time.
Is it worth the effort though? Does compiling the kernel in 3 minutes
really save you much in the long run over compiling in 3.25 minutes?
I tried to overclock my dual P120 to 133 a while back, and it ran fine,
but would not boot reliably. Once it booted, it would run months and
never crash...but I had to hit the reset button a few times every time I
wanted to boot it. I clocked it back to 120, and now, sometimes when it
boots it thinks its back at 133.
----don't waste your cpu, crack rc5...www.distributed.net team enzo---
Jon Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Spammers will be winnuked or
Network Administrator | nestea'd...whatever it takes
Florida Digital Turnpike | to get the job done.
______http://inorganic5.fdt.net/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key________
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
