Jason,
I've got a buddy up in Canada who's into all that and he runs the seti
stuff on both a win95 box and a linux box with nearly identical hardware
platforms (according to him) and he tells me the Linux box is about 10
times faster, and that's just a single processor. I'm buying a dual proc
box this week and I'll be able to give you some feedback about the dual
proc speed when I get everything set up.
Tim B.
At 11:24 PM 7/2/99 -0700, Jason Sogolow wrote:
>Hi list,
>Has anyone run a Linux command line version of SETI@home on a smp machine?
>How much faster is it than the screensaver running on a 'comparable' single
>processor under say, Win 98?
>Thanks for the bandwidth,
>Jason
>
>-
>Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
>To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
Linux SMP list: FIRST see FAQ at http://www.irisa.fr/prive/mentre/smp-faq/
To Unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe linux-smp" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
