On Sat, 28 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> A 25% disk i/o decrease is very serious. Lets get some serious feedback
> from people running internet and database servers before we blow off
> the server users in order to compete with BEOS.
Guys, if anybody thinks we're competing with BeOS, then wake up. BeOS is a
niche OS that isn't worth competing against, and at most we can try to
find out what it's good at and see if we can emulate some of it. But 25%
disk IO decrease is definitely not something we want to even consider.
Linus
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches wor... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches... Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREA... yodaiken
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (&... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (&... Ingo Molnar
- Re: [alsa-devel] Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [alsa-devel] Re: [rtl] Low-latency pat... yodaiken
- Re: [alsa-devel] Re: [rtl] Low-latency... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [alsa-devel] Re: [rtl] Low-la... yodaiken
- Re: [alsa-devel] Re: [rtl] Lo... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2... David Olofson
- Re: Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2.9ms audio ... Ingo Molnar
- Re: Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2.9ms a... Benno Senoner
