Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2.9ms audio latency), see testresults ,but ISDN troubles

[Ingo Molnar]

On Sun, 29 Aug 1999, Alan Cox wrote:

> We also have tons of time. Its not a 2.2. candidate

yes. between 2.2 and 2.3 there were so many fundamental changes that i
will not even try to clean the 2.2 patch up - it would be too fundamental
anyway. If anyone wants a solution for 2.2, the current patch can be used
(it's 100% stable), but i'm developing the 'clean patch' only for 2.3.

-- mingo