Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Anyway, I already applied you previous patch, because it seemed to be an > improvement even if technically wrong.
Great, but please note that: > However, the old patch was wrong in that it could assign ->ident to > SYM_BASETYPE ctype. It is (I think) harmless, but of course incorrect. Should I send the patch which checks for SYM_STRUCT/SYM_UNION before assign to ->ident? Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
