On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > However, the old patch was wrong in that it could assign ->ident to > > SYM_BASETYPE ctype. It is (I think) harmless, but of course incorrect. > > Should I send the patch which checks for SYM_STRUCT/SYM_UNION before > assign to ->ident?
Yes, makes sense.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sparse" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
