On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 02:05:55PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Monday, December 16, 2013 at 09:58:45 AM, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > +struct spi_nor { > > +     struct mtd_info         *mtd;
> > +   struct mutex            lock;
> > +
> > +   /* pointer to a spi device */
> > +   struct device           *dev;
> > +   u32                     page_size;
> > +   u8                      addr_width;
> > +   u8                      erase_opcode;
> > +   u8                      read_opcode;
> > +   u8                      read_dummy;
> > +   u8                      program_opcode;
> > +   enum read_mode          flash_read;
> > +   bool                    sst_write_second;
> > +   struct spi_nor_xfer_cfg cfg;
> 
> You do want to split the function pointers below and the device configuration 
> above into separate structures.

sorry, i prefer to keep them in one data structrue, just like the
nand_chip{} does.

> 
> > +   /* for write_reg */
> > +   u8                      cmd_buf[SPI_NOR_MAX_CMD_SIZE];
> > +
> > +   /*
> > +    * Do some work before or after we run these operations:
> > +    *   read/write/erese/lock/unlock
> 
> Proper kernel-doc style comments for this structure would be nice.

Do you mean the style used by nand_chip{}?

thanks
Huang Shijie

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to