On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Steven King <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Saturday 08 March 2014 10:11:10 pm Axel Lin wrote:
>> If pdata->cs_control is NULL, we will hit NULL pointer dereference in
>> mcfqspi_cs_select() and mcfqspi_cs_deselect(). Thus add NULL test for
>> pdata->cs_control in probe().
>
> D'oh! My bad. Actually you're right there would be a NULL pointer
> dereference in cs_select and cs_deselect (I was looking at the cs_setup and
> cs_teardown in the patch) and so cs_control must not be NULL. Thats want I
> get for replying before I've had my coffee and when I haven't looked at the
> code in awhile. So yeah, the patch is GTG.
I had the same first impression. But after looking through the code, the
changes is fine. Furthermore, there's only on in-tree user it, which does
provide cs_control.
There's more opportunity for cleanup, though, as cs_control provides control
of a GPIO, which can be handled by the SPI core, too.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
