On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 09:04:05AM -0700, Steven King wrote:

> D'oh!  My bad.  Actually you're right there would be a NULL pointer 
> dereference in cs_select and cs_deselect  (I was looking at the cs_setup and 
> cs_teardown in the patch) and so cs_control must not be NULL.  Thats want I 
> get for replying before I've had my coffee and when I haven't looked at the 
> code in awhile.  So yeah, the patch is GTG.

Hrm, I managed to make the same mistake when I redid the verification
somehow.  Odd.  Anyway, reinstated the patch.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to