On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 08:33:15PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> + if (np && master->cs_gpios != NULL && spi->cs_gpio >= 0) {
> + /* SPI core parse and update master->cs_gpio */
> gpio_chipsel = true;
> + gpio = spi->cs_gpio;
> + } else if (pdata->chip_sel &&
> + chip_sel < pdata->num_chipselect &&
> + pdata->chip_sel[chip_sel] != SPI_INTERN_CS) {
> + /* platform data defines chip_sel */
> + gpio_chipsel = true;
> + gpio = pdata->chip_sel[chip_sel];
> + }
This would all be a lot simpler and more direct if you were to arrange
to use cs_gpio in the struct spi_device, and move you closer to
converting to use more of the core functionality.
> + if (np && (master->cs_gpios != NULL) && (spi->cs_gpio >= 0)) {
> + retval =
> + gpio_request(spi->cs_gpio, dev_name(&spi->dev));
> + if (retval) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev,
> + "GPIO %d request failed\n",
> + spi->cs_gpio);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + gpio_direction_output(spi->cs_gpio,
> + !(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH));
> + internal_cs = false;
It's much better to use gpio_request_one() rather than using
gpio_request(), it's one function apart from anything else. The above
is also discarding the return code of gpio_request() meaning it's broken
for deferred probe. The error code should also appear in the error
message.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
