Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006, Ole Husgaard wrote:
As for your "license termination" against Dave: This is not that easy
with the GPL and LGPL license, as you would have known if you had asked
a copyright lawyer who know these licenses. It is, however, quite easy
to force somebody to adhere to the terms of the GPL or LGPL under the
copyright law of almost all countries in the world.
Are you a lawyer? I'm not, but this passage reads pretty clear to me:
4. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program
except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt
otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the Program is
void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License.
The misunderstanding is that the "terminate" in the above quote
isn't permanent and isn't a result of an expression of an author's
wishes (such as your e-mail notification of termination). For
example, in the Fortinet case, the court imposed an injunction
"banning them from further distribution of their products until
they are in compliance with the GNU GPL conditions". Fortinet
today distributes products using GPL code. The difference is
that they started including a copy of the licence and making
source available.
Regards,
Steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Schefter phone: +1 705 725 9999 x26
The Software Group Limited fax: +1 705 725 9666
642 Welham Road, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Barrie, Ontario CANADA L4N 9A1 Web: www.wanware.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-streams mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.openss7.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-streams
