Hi, On 05/17/2014 09:43 AM, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > On Fri, 16 May 2014 21:40:07 +0100 > Ian Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 23:11 +0300, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: >>>> I think this change is an improvement, but if we do this, we also >>>> need to upstream it. Ian what is your take on this? IOW are you >>>> ok with my applying this to the u-boot-sunxi git repo ? >> >> While things aren't yet upstream I'm in two minds. >> >> Once it does go upstream I think it would pay to be quite strict about >> accepting stuff into u-boot-sunxi.git. There's not much point going to >> all the effort upstreaming things if it is just allowed to diverge >> again, and I don't really want to be forever playing catch up. > > As I see it, the 'sunxi' branch at u-boot-sunxi.git is good for > nothing. It does not even try to be in a workable state for the > end users (the broken GMAC is telling a lot).
That is not true, u-boot-sunxi.git should be the default branch for end users to use. I've not bothered fixing GMAC since I did not think anyone was actually using network boot. But you're right we should fix it. Ian, if I'm not mistaken to fix GMAC I should merge the patches from your ijc/designware branch correct? I know this will grow the diff, but Siarhei is right, we cannot leave the default branch we expect our end users to use in a broken state. As for the "Thumb2 for FEL" patch, I think the patch is good, since it unifies the 2 SPL-s a bit, but to keep things easier with upstreaming I would like to ask you (Siarhei) to keep it in your own repo for now. Regards, Hans -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
