On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 04:01:35PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Rename SUNXI_IRQ_NUMBER to IRQ_PER_BANK as it no longer represents the total > number of irqs and use it instead of the number of irqs-per-reg when > calculating the bank to use for the various sunxi_irq_xxx_reg functions. > This fixes sunxi_irq_cfg_reg using the wrong bank for irqs >= 8. > > Also sunxi_irq_cfg_reg_from_bank returns the address of pio_int_cfg0, add an > offset to the register returned for irqs living in the pio_int_cfg[1-3]. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Good catch, I've squashed it into my serie with minor modifications (remove the cfg_reg_from_bank that doesn't make any sense). Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
