On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 04:01:35PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Rename SUNXI_IRQ_NUMBER to IRQ_PER_BANK as it no longer represents the total >> number of irqs and use it instead of the number of irqs-per-reg when >> calculating the bank to use for the various sunxi_irq_xxx_reg functions. >> This fixes sunxi_irq_cfg_reg using the wrong bank for irqs >= 8. >> >> Also sunxi_irq_cfg_reg_from_bank returns the address of pio_int_cfg0, add an >> offset to the register returned for irqs living in the pio_int_cfg[1-3]. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> > > Good catch, I've squashed it into my serie with minor modifications > (remove the cfg_reg_from_bank that doesn't make any sense).
I'm more than a little confused by your and Hans parallell patch series to sunxi now :-) I will try to apply your patches first, then Hans' as you're the maintainer of this driver. Yours, Linus Walleij -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.