Hi Chen-Yu,

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:48:05AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]>

A commit log would be nice here. Is it different from A31? do you know
wether later SoCs reuses it?

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt |  1 +
>  drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-mod0.c                      | 55 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> index 425b109..fb3b7aa 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ Required properties:
>       "allwinner,sun4i-a10-mmc-output-clk" - for the MMC output clock on A10
>       "allwinner,sun4i-a10-mmc-sample-clk" - for the MMC sample clock on A10
>       "allwinner,sun4i-a10-mod0-clk" - for the module 0 family of clocks
> +     "allwinner,sun8i-a23-mbus-clk" - for the MBUS clock on A23
>       "allwinner,sun7i-a20-out-clk" - for the external output clocks
>       "allwinner,sun7i-a20-gmac-clk" - for the GMAC clock module on A20/A31
>       "allwinner,sun4i-a10-usb-clk" - for usb gates + resets on A10 / A20
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-mod0.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-mod0.c
> index 4a56385..9850887 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-mod0.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-mod0.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,61 @@ static void __init sun5i_a13_mbus_setup(struct device_node 
> *node)
>  }
>  CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun5i_a13_mbus, "allwinner,sun5i-a13-mbus-clk", 
> sun5i_a13_mbus_setup);
>  
> +/**
> + * sun8i_a23_get_mbus_factors() - calculates m factor for MBUS clocks
> + * MBUS rate is calculated as follows
> + * rate = parent_rate / (m + 1);
> + */
> +
> +static void sun8i_a23_get_mbus_factors(u32 *freq, u32 parent_rate,
> +                                    u8 *n, u8 *k, u8 *m, u8 *p)
> +{
> +     u8 div;
> +
> +     /* These clocks can only divide, so we will never be able to achieve
> +      * frequencies higher than the parent frequency */

This doesn't follow the multi-line comment style.

> +     if (*freq > parent_rate)
> +             *freq = parent_rate;
> +
> +     div = DIV_ROUND_UP(parent_rate, *freq);
> +
> +     if (div > 8)
> +             div = 8;
> +
> +     *freq = parent_rate / div;
> +
> +     /* we were called to round the frequency, we can now return */
> +     if (m == NULL)
> +             return;
> +
> +     *m = div - 1;
> +}
> +
> +static struct clk_factors_config sun8i_a23_mbus_config = {
> +     .mshift = 0,
> +     .mwidth = 3,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct factors_data sun8i_a23_mbus_data __initconst = {
> +     .enable = 31,
> +     .mux = 24,
> +     .table = &sun8i_a23_mbus_config,
> +     .getter = sun8i_a23_get_mbus_factors,
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sun8i_a23_mbus_lock);
> +
> +static void __init sun8i_a23_mbus_setup(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> +     struct clk *mbus = sunxi_factors_register(node, &sun8i_a23_mbus_data,
> +                                               &sun8i_a23_mbus_lock);
> +
> +     /* The MBUS clocks needs to be always enabled */
> +     __clk_get(mbus);
> +     clk_prepare_enable(mbus);
> +}
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_a23_mbus, "allwinner,sun8i-a23-mbus-clk", 
> sun8i_a23_mbus_setup);
> +

It looks like it's pretty much stand alone. Would you mind putting it
into a file of its own? something like clk-sun8i-mbus.c?

Thanks,
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to