On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 09:37:27AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> of_clk_get_parent_name() uses the clock-indices property to resolve >> clock phandle arguments in case that the argument index does not >> match the clock-output-names sequence. >> >> This is the case on sunxi, where we use the actual bit index as the >> argument to the phandle. Add the clock-indices property so that >> of_clk_get_parent_name() resolves the names correctly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]> > > Applied. Are the mask in the clock driver still of any use now? I > don't think they are, and if we're going that way, I'd rather have > them removed from the driver.
Yes they are still passed through factors_data, for mux_clk_ops to know about the width of the mux, which is 3 bits on older SoCs vs 4 bits on sun9i. ChenYu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
