On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:24:04AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Maxime Ripard > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 09:37:27AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> of_clk_get_parent_name() uses the clock-indices property to resolve > >> clock phandle arguments in case that the argument index does not > >> match the clock-output-names sequence. > >> > >> This is the case on sunxi, where we use the actual bit index as the > >> argument to the phandle. Add the clock-indices property so that > >> of_clk_get_parent_name() resolves the names correctly. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <[email protected]> > > > > Applied. Are the mask in the clock driver still of any use now? I > > don't think they are, and if we're going that way, I'd rather have > > them removed from the driver. > > Yes they are still passed through factors_data, for mux_clk_ops to > know about the width of the mux, which is 3 bits on older SoCs vs > 4 bits on sun9i.
Erm.... These are gates. They are not muxable and are not handled through clk-factors, so I'm not sure how it is relevant :) Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
