On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:13:05AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> +     clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
> >> +     if (!clk_parent)
> >> +             return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> +     data->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> >> +     if (IS_ERR(data->clk)) {
> >> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not get clock\n");
> >> +             return PTR_ERR(data->clk);
> >> +     }
> >
> > I'm wondering, why are you using of_clk_get_parent_name here, instead
> > of __clk_get_name on data->clk? That would avoid parsing the DT while
> > we already have that info.
> 
> I hadn't thought of that. I was sticking to public consumer APIs.
> Do you want me to respin this one?

I don't think it's really a !consumer API. All it does is returning
clk->name, which is accessible even to consumers.

But yeah, please resend it.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to