Hi,

On 30-06-16 12:18, Jonas Gorski wrote:
Hi,

On 30 June 2016 at 12:04, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,


On 30-06-16 11:58, Kalle Valo wrote:

Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> writes:

Hi,

On 30-06-16 11:02, Kalle Valo wrote:

Priit Laes <pl...@plaes.org> writes:

What is the size of this nvram file? As it's board specific, I wonder
if we can simply include it inside of the DT verbatim. I remember
doing that (in the pre-dtb days, on real open firmware) for the
"spidernet"
ethernet driver.


It contains a bit too much info:

This is what CubieTruck requires:


http://dl.cubieboard.org/public/Cubieboard/benn/firmware/ap6210/nvram_ap6210.txt


In the nvram file I see lots of identifiers:

manfid=0x2d0
prodid=0x492
vendid=0x14e4
devid=0x4343
boardtype=0x0598
boardrev=0x1307
boardnum=777

Are any of these (or a combination of them) unique for each board type?
What if one of these is provided through DT and then the driver could
choose the nvram file based on the board id? Just another idea...


That would require updating a table in the driver every time a new
board comes out, I do not believe that that is a good solution.


You don't necessarily need to have a table in the driver if you embed
the id to the filename, for example something like this:

nvram-0598-1307.txt
nvram-<boardtype>-<boardrev>.txt


Downside of this is, that as Arend already said, the nvram files are not
readily available.

Typically the boards we are talking about are shipped with android,
and the mainline kernel bringup is done by a user, not the manufacturer.

So the nvram file needs to be extracted from e.g. an android image,
having ap6210 in the filename allows the user to see that his module
(which is clearly labelled ap6210 is already supported, where as the
boardtype/boardrev magic numbers are a big unknown.

So I believe that using a human readable string is better here.

So then how about making use of a more specific compatible string?

e.g.

brcmf {
        compatible = "foo,ap6210", "brcm,bcm4329-fmac";
        ...
};

and if the compatible has more than one element you request
FW_NAME_<compatible>.txt as the nvram file. Or try each comptible (and
lastly no suffix) until you get a match. (AFAICT, this is what the
"model" property was originally intended for anyway, but almost nobody
did it right, and everyone put a user readable string into "model" for
boards instead of the ePAPR defined compatible string).

Hmm, interesting idea. Not sure how easy / hard it will be to implement
this, but from a dt binding point of view it seems elegant.

Kalle, Arend, what do you think of this ?

Regards,

Hans

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to linux-sunxi+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to