On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:13:54AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > And I don't really know what the constraints are on the SPL side, but > > it's really tight on our end. So maybe I'm exagerating, but you're > > definitely understating it too. > > You can fit into 16k , can you not ?
We have 13k. > >>> This is no longer a simple request, but some huge spaghetti changes > >>> that need to be done, mostly by volunteers. > >> > >> I am not sure this "volunteers" argument really works in this > >> discussion, since this looks like a commercial contribution to me. > > > > I have no idea to be honest. The maintainance however is volunteering > > on my side, and I'm getting a bit tired to see that every one has an > > agenda without any consideration about who has the time and resources > > to actually do it. > > My agenda is to make sure upstream doesn't become a swamp. And it will become less of a swamp with those patches with the phy conversion, so you can tick that on your checklist I guess? Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
