On 05/18/2018 01:51 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:13:54AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> And I don't really know what the constraints are on the SPL side, but >>> it's really tight on our end. So maybe I'm exagerating, but you're >>> definitely understating it too. >> >> You can fit into 16k , can you not ? > > We have 13k.
Yuck, in total or for code/data ? Seems very similar to CI20. >>>>> This is no longer a simple request, but some huge spaghetti changes >>>>> that need to be done, mostly by volunteers. >>>> >>>> I am not sure this "volunteers" argument really works in this >>>> discussion, since this looks like a commercial contribution to me. >>> >>> I have no idea to be honest. The maintainance however is volunteering >>> on my side, and I'm getting a bit tired to see that every one has an >>> agenda without any consideration about who has the time and resources >>> to actually do it. >> >> My agenda is to make sure upstream doesn't become a swamp. > > And it will become less of a swamp with those patches with the phy > conversion, so you can tick that on your checklist I guess? I think so -- Best regards, Marek Vasut -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
