On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 08:59:01PM +0100, Clément Péron wrote:
> From: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>
> 
> PWM core has an option to bypass whole logic and output unchanged source
> clock as PWM output. This is achieved by enabling bypass bit.
> 
> Note that when bypass is enabled, no other setting has any meaning, not
> even enable bit.
> 
> This mode of operation is needed to achieve high enough frequency to
> serve as clock source for AC200 chip which is integrated into same
> package as H6 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> index 1fa2057419fb..0fe9c680d6d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
>   * Driver for Allwinner sun4i Pulse Width Modulation Controller
>   *
>   * Copyright (C) 2014 Alexandre Belloni 
> <[email protected]>
> + *
> + * Limitations:
> + * - When outputing the source clock directly, the PWM logic will be bypassed
> + *   and the currently running period is not guaranteed to be completed
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
> @@ -73,6 +77,7 @@ static const u32 prescaler_table[] = {
>  
>  struct sun4i_pwm_data {
>       bool has_prescaler_bypass;
> +     bool has_direct_mod_clk_output;
>       unsigned int npwm;
>  };
>  
> @@ -118,6 +123,20 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  
>       val = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
>  
> +     /*
> +      * PWM chapter in H6 manual has a diagram which explains that if bypass
> +      * bit is set, no other setting has any meaning. Even more, experiment
> +      * proved that also enable bit is ignored in this case.
> +      */
> +     if ((val & BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm)) &&
> +         sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
> +             state->period = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC, clk_rate);
> +             state->duty_cycle = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(state->period, 2);
> +             state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
> +             state->enabled = true;
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
>       if ((PWM_REG_PRESCAL(val, pwm->hwpwm) == PWM_PRESCAL_MASK) &&
>           sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass)
>               prescaler = 1;
> @@ -149,13 +168,24 @@ static void sun4i_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>  
>  static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm,
>                              const struct pwm_state *state,
> -                            u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr)
> +                            u32 *dty, u32 *prd, unsigned int *prsclr,
> +                            bool *bypass)
>  {
>       u64 clk_rate, div = 0;
>       unsigned int pval, prescaler = 0;
>  
>       clk_rate = clk_get_rate(sun4i_pwm->clk);
>  
> +     *bypass = sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output &&
> +               state->enabled &&
> +               (state->period * clk_rate >= NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
> +               (state->period * clk_rate < 2 * NSEC_PER_SEC) &&
> +               (state->duty_cycle * clk_rate * 2 >= NSEC_PER_SEC);
> +
> +     /* Skip calculation of other parameters if we bypass them */
> +     if (*bypass)
> +             return 0;
> +
>       if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) {
>               /* First, test without any prescaler when available */
>               prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK;
> @@ -206,6 +236,7 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct 
> pwm_device *pwm,
>       int ret;
>       unsigned int delay_us, prescaler;
>       unsigned long now;
> +     bool bypass;
>  
>       pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
>  
> @@ -220,7 +251,8 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct 
> pwm_device *pwm,
>       spin_lock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
>       ctrl = sun4i_pwm_readl(sun4i_pwm, PWM_CTRL_REG);
>  
> -     ret = sun4i_pwm_calculate(sun4i_pwm, state, &duty, &period, &prescaler);
> +     ret = sun4i_pwm_calculate(sun4i_pwm, state, &duty, &period, &prescaler,
> +                               &bypass);
>       if (ret) {
>               dev_err(chip->dev, "period exceeds the maximum value\n");
>               spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
> @@ -229,6 +261,18 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct 
> pwm_device *pwm,
>               return ret;
>       }
>  
> +     if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_direct_mod_clk_output) {
> +             if (bypass) {
> +                     ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
> +                     /* We can skip other parameter */
> +                     sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
> +                     spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
> +                     return 0;
> +             } else {
> +                     ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
> +             }
> +     }

This could be simplified to:

        if (bypass) {
                ctrl |= BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
                /*
                 * Other parameters are not relevant in this mode and so
                 * writing them can be skipped
                 */
                sun4i_pwm_writel(sun4i_pwm, ctrl, PWM_CTRL_REG);
                spin_unlock(&sun4i_pwm->ctrl_lock);
                return 0;
        } else {
                ctrl &= ~BIT_CH(PWM_BYPASS, pwm->hwpwm);
        }

which has the advantage(?) that the bypass bit is also (more obviously)
cleared for SoCs that don't support it and it reduces the indention
level.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"linux-sunxi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linux-sunxi/20191121211630.slgayfbuykwvlvdt%40pengutronix.de.

Reply via email to