On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 19:06:22 +0200 "Fernando F. Mancera" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 25/08/2024 09:41, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:25:40 -0400 > > Fernando Fernandez Mancera <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> When initializing trace_probes::nr_args, make sure the maximum number of > >> probe arguments is honored. Oherwise, we can hit a NULL pointer > >> dereferences in multiple situations like on traceprobe_set_print_fmt(). > >> > >> Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2303876 > > > > Sorry for replying later. I'm not sure why but I did not found this in my > > mbox... > > > > No worries! > > > Anyway, trace_probe_init() should return -E2BIG in this case because > > it is actuall wrong value. > > > > Can you update your patch? > > > > I agree this is the right solution but it would mean a change in > behavior. Is that fine? Before merging 035ba76014c0, it was writing up > to the maximum number of arguments and ignoring the rest. If you confirm > it is fine to change the behavior, I will update the patch. Yes, I think this is the better behavior for users too, rather than silently droping some arguments. We also need to handle this error code in callsite and log an error, and add a testcase in the syntax error testcase. But that should be done in another series. We should fix this first. Thank you, > > Thank you! > > > Thank you, > > > > > >> > >> Fixes: 035ba76014c0 ("tracing/probes: cleanup: Set trace_probe::nr_args at > >> trace_probe_init") > >> Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> kernel/trace/trace_probe.c | 8 ++++++-- > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c > >> index 39877c80d6cb..f577b5e71026 100644 > >> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c > >> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c > >> @@ -2043,10 +2043,14 @@ int trace_probe_init(struct trace_probe *tp, const > >> char *event, > >> goto error; > >> } > >> > >> - tp->nr_args = nargs; > >> + if (nargs > MAX_TRACE_ARGS) > >> + tp->nr_args = MAX_TRACE_ARGS; > >> + else > >> + tp->nr_args = nargs; > >> + > >> /* Make sure pointers in args[] are NULL */ > >> if (nargs) > >> - memset(tp->args, 0, sizeof(tp->args[0]) * nargs); > >> + memset(tp->args, 0, sizeof(tp->args[0]) * tp->nr_args); > >> > >> return 0; > >> > > > > -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <[email protected]>
