On 2024-10-09 15:03:07 [+0200], Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > > b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > > index 9c10fb180f438..8b5a5ddea4293 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > > @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ int arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, > > struct task_struct *src); > > * - pending work-to-be-done flags are in lowest half-word > > * - other flags in upper half-word(s) > > */ > > +#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY 0 /* Lazy rescheduling needed */ > > #define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME 1 /* callback before returning to user */ > > #define TIF_SIGPENDING 2 /* signal pending */ > > #define TIF_NEED_RESCHED 3 /* rescheduling necessary */ > > So for x86 I shuffled the flags around to have the two NEED_RESCHED ones > side-by-side. Not strictly required ofcourse, but...
I can shuffle them. I don't think the riscv camp will complain (saying this for them to actual complain if so). Sebastian
