On 4/28/25 10:10 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:17:01AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 04:22:22PM -0700, Indu Bhagat wrote:
On 4/24/25 7:37 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
From: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Use the CFI macros instead of the raw .cfi_* directives to be consistent
with the rest of the VDSO asm. It's also easier on the eyes.
No functional changes.
Although unrelated to the current intent of the patch, a question:
Why does the stub after .Linvoke_userspace_handler in vsgs.S not have CFI
directives ?
Yeah, looks like that stack alignment code needs some CFI.
Actually, this function uses a frame pointer so I think the stack
pointer alignment shouldn't affect the CFI?
You are right. rbx is already handled too with the required CFI in the
prologue.
