On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 10:05:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 09:46:25AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > AFAIU the goal here is to turn the guard(preempt_notrace)() into a
> > guard(rcu_notrace)() because the preempt-off critical sections don't
> > agree with BPF.
>
> OK, got it, thank you!
>
> The combination of BPF and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT certainly has provided at
> least its share of entertainment, that is for sure. ;-)
Is there a similar issue with CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY, given that in that
case rcu_read_unlock() maps to preempt_enable(), which also can invoke
the scheduler?
Thanx, Paul
