On Tue, 2025-09-23 at 07:28 +0200, Nam Cao wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
> 

Thanks for finding this!

> Nathan Chancellor <nat...@kernel.org> writes:
> > I am seeing a crash when reading from
> > /sys/kernel/tracing/rv/enabled_monitors
> > on a couple of my arm64 boxes running Fedora after this change, which
> > landed in mainline in 6.17-rc7. I can reproduce this in QEMU pretty
> > easily.
> ...
> > With this change reverted, there is no crash. As this change seems to
> > have proper justification, is there some other latent bug here?
> 
> Thanks for the report.
> 
> Yes, this patch is broken, because argument 'p' of
> enabled_monitors_next() *is* a pointer to struct rv_monitor. I'm not
> sure how did I even test this patch...

Damn, I'm wondering the same :facepalm: ..

> Steven is right, we really need something in kselftest for RV, another thing
> in my RV TODO list.

I can work on that, at least a few selftests for the sysfs, I think this gets
the top priority now.

> 
> But reverting is not the real fix, because monitors_show() still expects
> a pointer to list_head. Changing monitors_show() is not an option,
> because it is shared with the 'available_monitors' interface.
> 
> So the real fix is completely changing the iterator to be list_head
> instead of rv_monitor.

Looks reasonable, can you work on the fix?
I see Steve is out for conferences so this won't be too urgent.

Thanks,
Gabriele

> 
> Best regards,
> Nam
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/rv/rv.c b/kernel/trace/rv/rv.c
> index 48338520376f..43e9ea473cda 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/rv/rv.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/rv/rv.c
> @@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ static void *enabled_monitors_next(struct seq_file *m,
> void *p, loff_t *pos)
>  
>       list_for_each_entry_continue(mon, &rv_monitors_list, list) {
>               if (mon->enabled)
> -                     return mon;
> +                     return &mon->list;
>       }
>  
>       return NULL;
> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static void *enabled_monitors_next(struct seq_file *m,
> void *p, loff_t *pos)
>  
>  static void *enabled_monitors_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
>  {
> -     struct rv_monitor *mon;
> +     struct list_head *head;
>       loff_t l;
>  
>       mutex_lock(&rv_interface_lock);
> @@ -517,15 +517,15 @@ static void *enabled_monitors_start(struct seq_file *m,
> loff_t *pos)
>       if (list_empty(&rv_monitors_list))
>               return NULL;
>  
> -     mon = list_entry(&rv_monitors_list, struct rv_monitor, list);
> +     head = &rv_monitors_list;
>  
>       for (l = 0; l <= *pos; ) {
> -             mon = enabled_monitors_next(m, mon, &l);
> -             if (!mon)
> +             head = enabled_monitors_next(m, head, &l);
> +             if (!head)
>                       break;
>       }
>  
> -     return mon;
> +     return head;
>  }
>  
>  /*


Reply via email to