When s_start() fails to allocate memory for set_event_iter, it returns NULL
before acquiring event_mutex. However, the corresponding s_stop() function
always tries to unlock the mutex, causing a lock imbalance warning:

  WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
  6.17.0-rc7-00175-g2b2e0c04f78c #7 Not tainted
  -------------------------------------
  syz.0.85611/376514 is trying to release lock (event_mutex) at:
  [<ffffffff8dafc7a4>] traverse.part.0.constprop.0+0x2c4/0x650 fs/seq_file.c:131
  but there are no more locks to release!

The issue was introduced by commit b355247df104 ("tracing: Cache ':mod:'
events for modules not loaded yet") which added the kzalloc() allocation before
the mutex lock, creating a path where s_start() could return without locking
the mutex while s_stop() would still try to unlock it.

Fix this by unconditionally acquiring the mutex immediately after allocation,
regardless of whether the allocation succeeded.

Fixes: b355247df104 ("tracing: Cache ":mod:" events for modules not loaded yet")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 9f3e9537417d5..e00da4182deb7 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -1629,11 +1629,10 @@ static void *s_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
        loff_t l;
 
        iter = kzalloc(sizeof(*iter), GFP_KERNEL);
+       mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
        if (!iter)
                return NULL;
 
-       mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
-
        iter->type = SET_EVENT_FILE;
        iter->file = list_entry(&tr->events, struct trace_event_file, list);
 
-- 
2.51.0


Reply via email to