On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 2:00 PM Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Dec 2025 16:52:12 -0500 > Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 18:24:57 +0100 > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > My concern is that the patch effectively removes one trace point > > > (cpu_frequency) and adds another one with a different format > > > (policy_frequency), updates one utility in the kernel tree and expects > > > everyone else to somehow know that they should switch over. > > > > > > I know about at least several people who have their own scripts using > > > this tracepoint though. > > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > Can you reach out to those that have scripts that use this trace event to > > see if it can be changed? > > > > Thanks, > > I got a bunch of "Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender". It seems that gmail > thinks my goodmis.org account is now spam :-p > > -- Steve > Hi Rafael,
Bumping thread since it's unclear if Steven's email has gone through. Are you able to reach out to those with the scripts using this tracepoint to see if they can be changed? Hopefully this update can be proactive, but I'm optimistic even a reactive update would be straightforward. -- Sam
