hi,
gentle ping, thanks

jirka

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 10:54:09AM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 6:50 AM Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > hi,
> > while poking the multi-tracing interface I ended up with just one ftrace_ops
> > object to attach all trampolines.
> >
> > This change allows to use less direct API calls during the attachment 
> > changes
> > in the future code, so in effect speeding up the attachment.
> >
> > In current code we get a speed up from using just a single ftrace_ops 
> > object.
> >
> > - with current code:
> >
> >   Performance counter stats for 'bpftrace -e fentry:vmlinux:ksys_* {} -c 
> > true':
> >
> >      6,364,157,902      cycles:k
> >        828,728,902      cycles:u
> >      1,064,803,824      instructions:u                   #    1.28  insn 
> > per cycle
> >     23,797,500,067      instructions:k                   #    3.74  insn 
> > per cycle
> >
> >        4.416004987 seconds time elapsed
> >
> >        0.164121000 seconds user
> >        1.289550000 seconds sys
> >
> >
> > - with the fix:
> >
> >    Performance counter stats for 'bpftrace -e fentry:vmlinux:ksys_* {} -c 
> > true':
> >
> >      6,535,857,905      cycles:k
> >        810,809,429      cycles:u
> >      1,064,594,027      instructions:u                   #    1.31  insn 
> > per cycle
> >     23,962,552,894      instructions:k                   #    3.67  insn 
> > per cycle
> >
> >        1.666961239 seconds time elapsed
> >
> >        0.157412000 seconds user
> >        1.283396000 seconds sys
> >
> >
> >
> > The speedup seems to be related to the fact that with single ftrace_ops 
> > object
> > we don't call ftrace_shutdown anymore (we use ftrace_update_ops instead) and
> > we skip the synchronize rcu calls (each ~100ms) at the end of that function.
> >
> > rfc: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
> > v1:  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
> > v2:  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
> > v3:  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
> > v4:  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
> > v5:  https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
> >
> > v6 changes:
> > - rename add_hash_entry_direct to add_ftrace_hash_entry_direct [Steven]
> > - factor hash_add/hash_sub [Steven]
> > - add kerneldoc header for update_ftrace_direct_* functions [Steven]
> > - few assorted smaller fixes [Steven]
> > - added missing direct_ops wrappers for 
> > !CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS
> >   case [Steven]
> >
> 
> So this looks good from BPF side, I think. Steven, if you don't mind
> giving this patch set another look and if everything is to your liking
> giving your ack, we can then apply it to bpf-next. Thanks!
> 
> > v5 changes:
> > - do not export ftrace_hash object [Steven]
> > - fix update_ftrace_direct_add new_filter_hash leak [ci]
> >
> > v4 changes:
> > - rebased on top of bpf-next/master (with jmp attach changes)
> >   added patch 1 to deal with that
> > - added extra checks for update_ftrace_direct_del/mod to address
> >   the ci bot review
> >
> > v3 changes:
> > - rebased on top of bpf-next/master
> > - fixed update_ftrace_direct_del cleanup path
> > - added missing inline to update_ftrace_direct_* stubs
> >
> > v2 changes:
> > - rebased on top fo bpf-next/master plus Song's livepatch fixes [1]
> > - renamed the API functions [2] [Steven]
> > - do not export the new api [Steven]
> > - kept the original direct interface:
> >
> >   I'm not sure if we want to melt both *_ftrace_direct and the new interface
> >   into single one. It's bit different in semantic (hence the name change as
> >   Steven suggested [2]) and I don't think the changes are not that big so
> >   we could easily keep both APIs.
> >
> > v1 changes:
> > - make the change x86 specific, after discussing with Mark options for
> >   arm64 [Mark]
> >
> > thanks,
> > jirka
> >
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
> > ---
> > Jiri Olsa (9):
> >       ftrace,bpf: Remove FTRACE_OPS_FL_JMP ftrace_ops flag
> >       ftrace: Make alloc_and_copy_ftrace_hash direct friendly
> >       ftrace: Export some of hash related functions
> >       ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_add function
> >       ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_del function
> >       ftrace: Add update_ftrace_direct_mod function
> >       bpf: Add trampoline ip hash table
> >       ftrace: Factor ftrace_ops ops_func interface
> >       bpf,x86: Use single ftrace_ops for direct calls
> >
> >  arch/x86/Kconfig        |   1 +
> >  include/linux/bpf.h     |   7 ++-
> >  include/linux/ftrace.h  |  31 +++++++++-
> >  kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 259 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  kernel/trace/Kconfig    |   3 +
> >  kernel/trace/ftrace.c   | 406 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  6 files changed, 632 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> >

Reply via email to