On Sat, Feb 14, 2026, Ackerley Tng wrote: > Sean is against deferring whether to preserve memory to the underlying > hardware because that is letting (effectively) micro-architectural > behavior to define KVM's ABI. KVM's uAPI cannot let behavior be > undefined, or be based on vendor, and maybe even on firmware version.
Concretely, we'll end up with a giant mess if TDX and/or SNP adds support for preserving contents on conversion.
