Hi Steven,

Unless there are any further comments, could you please help to take
this through the tracing tree?

Thanks!

On Fri, Mar 6, 2026 at 11:06 PM Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 15:59:54 +0800
> Xuewen Yan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This reverts commit e3f6a42272e028c46695acc83fc7d7c42f2750ad.
> >
> > The commit says that the tracepoint only deals with the current task,
> > however the following case is not current task:
> >
> > comm_write() {
> >     p = get_proc_task(inode);
> >     if (!p)
> >         return -ESRCH;
> >
> >     if (same_thread_group(current, p))
> >         set_task_comm(p, buffer);
> > }
> > where set_task_comm() calls __set_task_comm() which records
> > the update of p and not current.
> >
> > So revert the patch to show pid.
> >
> > Fixes: e3f6a42272e0 ("tracing: Remove pid in task_rename tracing output")
> > Reported-by: Guohua Yan <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
>
> -- Steve
>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - update commit message (Steven)
> > ---
> >  include/trace/events/task.h | 7 +++++--
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/task.h b/include/trace/events/task.h
> > index 4f0759634306..b9a129eb54d9 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/task.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/task.h
> > @@ -38,19 +38,22 @@ TRACE_EVENT(task_rename,
> >       TP_ARGS(task, comm),
> >
> >       TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > +             __field(        pid_t,  pid)
> >               __array(        char, oldcomm,  TASK_COMM_LEN)
> >               __array(        char, newcomm,  TASK_COMM_LEN)
> >               __field(        short,  oom_score_adj)
> >       ),
> >
> >       TP_fast_assign(
> > +             __entry->pid = task->pid;
> >               memcpy(entry->oldcomm, task->comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> >               strscpy(entry->newcomm, comm, TASK_COMM_LEN);
> >               __entry->oom_score_adj = task->signal->oom_score_adj;
> >       ),
> >
> > -     TP_printk("oldcomm=%s newcomm=%s oom_score_adj=%hd",
> > -               __entry->oldcomm, __entry->newcomm, __entry->oom_score_adj)
> > +     TP_printk("pid=%d oldcomm=%s newcomm=%s oom_score_adj=%hd",
> > +             __entry->pid, __entry->oldcomm,
> > +             __entry->newcomm, __entry->oom_score_adj)
> >  );
> >
> >  /**
>

Reply via email to