Gabriele Monaco <[email protected]> writes: > Well, I believe a compiler failure was indeed the original intent (that's > kinda > what we do in rv_attach_trace_probe), to avoid unauthored monitors. > > Anyway an unauthored monitor isn't as bad as a missing tracepoint, so > probably I > could make the LTL template consistent with the others. > > Unless Nam has concerns with that.
No. Go for it. Nam
