On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 02:24:23 +0000 高翔 <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Steve, > > > Just checking if the metadata split I proposed last time looks > reasonable, so I know whether to proceed with the implementation: > > > total: > buffers_mem: > snapshot_buffers_mem: > metadata_mem: > > > where buffers_mem and snapshot_buffers_mem report all page memory, and > metadata_mem reports the slab-allocated ring-buffer metadata. > > > Would you like me to proceed with this split? > Let's start with just the buffers for now. Thinking about this more, the file can be called "memory_usage" and we can drop the "_mem" part of the items. # cat memory_usage_kb buffers: XXX snapshot buffers: XXX We can then add more information later. -- Steve
