On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 10:57:44AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Sep 2026, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 09:27:17AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Tue, 01 Sep 2026, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 13:34:44 +0100
> > > > Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Could we have this applied to Stable please:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 8a5f63637890 ("ring-buffer: Fix subbuf resize race with ring buffer 
> > > > > readers")
> > > > 
> > > > It's marked for stable so it should automatically be backported (if it
> > > 
> > > Where was it marked for Stable?
> > 
> > It has:
> >     Cc: [email protected]
> > in the patch itself.  It is in my queue to get to, along with over 1000+
> > other patches that people decided to tag for stable and yet wait for the
> > -rc1 merge window to get to Linus.
> 
> Am I losing the plot?  The patch that I replied to [0] did not Cc:
> Stable.  If it had, I wouldn't have made the request.
> 
>   From: Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]>
>   To: [email protected], [email protected],
>        [email protected]
>   Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
>        [email protected],
>       Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]>
>   Subject: [PATCH v5 06/10] tracing: Fix subbuf resize races with 
> trace_pipe_raw readers
> 
>   [...]
> 
>   Fixes: bce761d75745 ("ring-buffer: Read and write to ring buffers with 
> custom sub buffer size")
>   Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]>


I'm lost, I was referring to the above git id that was asked about,
sorry.

> > It will get there eventually...
> 
> This wasn't an urgent request or a request to expedite.  Take your time.

Back to the never-ending-queue...

greg k-h

Reply via email to