On 13 Sep 2026, at 23:39, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:23:58 -0400 Zi Yan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This patchset removes PG_private to make space for upcoming PG_folio for >> identifying pages from a folio (more details in Note below). Instead of >> checking PG_private, all code is changed to check page/folio->private != >> NULL instead. >> >> MM people are cc'd on all patches and subsystem people are cc'd on the >> cover letter and corresponding patches. >> >> Patch 6 is picked up separately in f2fs tree, but since mm-new does not >> have it yet, it is sent for MM testing. > > AI review claims to have found a pre-existing critical level deadlock > in f2fs: > > > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected] > > it also had a few things to say about this patchset and, as always, > hugetlb.c.
It seems that Sashiko overwrote my patch reviews with the reviews to Matthew’s md patches. :/ I wonder if there is a way of recovering them. > > > Thanks, The MM bits appear adequately reviewed and review of the non-MM > bits are, as usual: > > Great to have but I won't permit lack of other-than-MM review to > block MM improvements. > > So I'll queue it all up and shall push it into -next after a few days. > > Acks from non-MM maintainers are appreciated. > > If a non-MM patch appears in linux-next I'll autodrop the mm.git copy > of that patch. Thanks. Best Regards, Yan, Zi
